5,935,766 Shares

Common Stock

     The shareholders of Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. identified under “Selling shareholders” are offering and selling 5,935,766 shares of common stock under this prospectus, including 2,160,061 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants. We issued these securities in various private offerings. We will receive none of the proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling shareholders, except for the exercise price of the warrants, if and when such warrants are exercised, assuming the exercise price is paid in cash by the selling shareholders.

     Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “RNIN.” On June 12, 2007, the closing sale price of our common stock reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market was $7.29 per share. We intend to apply for listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “RNIN” assuming we meet the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Market following our proposed public offering.

     Investing in our common stock involves risks, including the risk that we have had substantial losses since inception. See “Risk factors” on page 5.

     Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is June 13, 2007.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Prospectus summary			1
Risk factors			5
Special note regarding forward-looking statements			14
Use of proceeds			15
Capitalization			16
Selected financial data			17
Market for common equity and related shareholder matters			18
Management’s discussion and analysis or plan of operation			18
Business			29
Management and board of directors			44
Executive compensation			46
Certain relationships and transactions and corporate governance			53
Principal shareholders			58
Description of securities			59
Selling shareholders			62
Plan of distribution			79
Legal matters			81
Experts			81
Where you can find more information			81
Index to financial statements			F-1

     You should rely only on the information contained in this document or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different. This document may only be used where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in this document may only be accurate on the date of this document.

     WIRELESS RONIN^®, RONINCAST^® and RONIN CAST^® are our registered trademarks. This prospectus also makes references to trademarks and tradenames that are owned by other entities.

1

2

3

(1)		Includes $390,247 and $37,410 in obsolete inventory write downs for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively.

4

RISK FACTORS

     Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before participating in this offering. You should also refer to the other information in this prospectus, including our financial statements and the related notes. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows could be materially harmed. As a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you might lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our operations and business are subject to the risks of an early stage company with limited revenue and a history of operating losses. We have incurred losses since inception, and we have had only nominal revenue. We may not ever become or remain profitable.

     Since inception, we have had limited revenue from the sale of our products and services, and we have incurred net losses. We incurred net losses of $4,789,925 and $14,787,737, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006. We had a net loss of $3,050,565 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, we had an accumulated deficit of $36,484,278. We expect to increase our spending significantly as we continue to expand our infrastructure and our sales and marketing efforts and continue research and development.

     We have not been profitable in any year of our operating history and anticipate incurring additional losses into the foreseeable future. We do not know whether or when we will become profitable. Even if we are able to achieve profitability in future periods, we may not be able to sustain or increase our profitability in successive periods. We may require additional financing in the future to support our operations. For further information, please review the risk factor “Adequate funds for our operations may not be available, requiring us to curtail our activities significantly” below.

     We have formulated our business plans and strategies based on certain assumptions regarding the acceptance of our business model and the marketing of our products and services. However, our assessments regarding market size, market share, or market acceptance of our products and services or a variety of other factors may prove incorrect. Our future success will depend upon many factors, including factors which may be beyond our control or which cannot be predicted at this time.

Our success depends on our RoninCast system achieving and maintaining widespread acceptance in our targeted markets. If our products contain errors or defects, our business reputation may be harmed.

     Our success will depend to a large extent on broad market acceptance of RoninCast and our other products and services among our prospective customers. Our prospective customers may still not use our solutions for a number of other reasons, including preference for static signage, unfamiliarity with our technology or perceived lack of reliability. We believe that the acceptance of RoninCast and our other products and services by our prospective customers will depend on the following factors:

	•		our ability to demonstrate RoninCast’s economic and other benefits;
	•		our customers becoming comfortable with using RoninCast; and
	•		the reliability of the software and hardware comprising RoninCast and our other products.

     Our software is complex and must meet stringent user requirements. Our products could contain errors or defects, especially when first introduced or when new models or versions are released, which could cause our customers to reject our products, result in increased service costs and warranty expenses and harm our reputation. We must develop our products quickly to keep pace with the rapidly changing digital signage and communications market. In the future, we

may experience delays in releasing new products as problems are corrected. In addition, some undetected errors or defects may only become apparent as new functions are added to our products. Delays, costs and damage to our reputation due to product defects could harm our business.

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.

     We may experience variability in our total sales on a quarterly basis as a result of many factors, including the condition of the electronic communication and digital signage industry in general, shifts in demand for software and hardware products, technological changes and industry announcements of new products and upgrades, absence of long-term commitments from customers, timing and variable lead-times of customer orders, delays in or cancellations of customer orders, effectiveness in managing our operations and changes in economic conditions in general. We may not consider it prudent to adjust our spending levels on the same timeframe; therefore, if total sales decline for a given quarter, our operating results may be materially adversely affected. As a result of the potential fluctuations in our quarterly operating results, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our financial results should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. Further, it is possible that in future quarters our operating results will be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In such event, the price of our common stock would likely be materially adversely affected.

Our prospective customers often take a long time to evaluate our products, and this lengthy and variable sales cycle makes it difficult to predict our operating results.

     It is difficult for us to forecast the timing and recognition of revenue from sales of our products because our prospective customers often take significant time evaluating our products before purchasing them. The period between initial customer contact and a purchase by a customer may be more than one year. During the evaluation period, prospective customers may decide not to purchase or may scale down proposed orders of our products for various reasons, including:

	•		reduced need to upgrade existing visual marketing systems;
	•		introduction of products by our competitors;
	•		lower prices offered by our competitors; and
	•		changes in budgets and purchasing priorities.

     Our prospective customers routinely require education regarding the use and benefit of our products. This may also lead to delays in receiving customers’ orders.

Adequate funds for our operations may not be available, requiring us to curtail our activities significantly.

     Based on our current and anticipated expense levels, existing capital resources and the net proceeds of our proposed public offering, we anticipate that our cash will be adequate to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months. Our future capital requirements, however, will depend on many factors, including our ability to successfully market and sell our products, develop new products and establish and leverage our strategic partnerships and reseller relationships. In order to meet our needs should we not become cash flow positive or should we be unable to sustain positive cash flow, we may be required to raise additional funding through public or private financings, including equity financings. Any additional equity financings may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. Adequate funds for our operations, whether from financial markets, collaborative or other arrangements, may not be available when needed or on terms attractive to us. If adequate funds are not available, our plans to expand our business may be adversely affected and we could be required to curtail our activities significantly.

Difficulty in developing and maintaining relationships with third party manufacturers, suppliers and service providers could adversely affect our ability to deliver our products and meet our customers’ demands.

     We rely on third parties to manufacture and supply parts and components for our products and provide order fulfillment, installation, repair services and technical and customer support. Our strategy to rely on third party manufacturers, suppliers and service providers involves a number of significant risks, including the loss of control over the manufacturing process, the potential absence of adequate capacity, the unavailability of certain parts and components used in our products and reduced control over delivery schedules, quality and costs. For example, we do not generally maintain a significant inventory of parts or components, but rely on suppliers to deliver necessary parts and components to third party manufacturers, in a timely manner, based on our forecasts. If delivery of our products and services to our customers is interrupted, or if our products experience quality problems, our ability to meet customer demands would be harmed, causing a loss of revenue and harm to our reputation. Increased costs, transition difficulties and lead times involved in developing additional or new third party relationships could adversely affect our ability to deliver our products and meet our customers’ demands and harm our business.

Reductions in hardware costs will likely decrease hardware pricing to our customers and would reduce our per unit revenue.

     Our product pricing includes a standard percentage markup over our cost of product components, such as computers and display monitors. As such, any decrease in our costs to acquire such components from third parties will likely be reflected as a decrease in our hardware pricing to our customers. Therefore, reductions in such hardware costs could potentially reduce our revenue.

Because our business model relies upon strategic partners and resellers, we expect to face risks not faced by companies with only internal sales forces.

     We currently sell most of our products through an internal sales force. We anticipate that strategic partners and resellers will become a larger part of our sales strategy. We may not, however, be successful in forming relationships with qualified partners and resellers. If we fail to attract qualified partners and resellers, we may not be able to expand our sales network, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to generate revenue. Our anticipated reliance on partners and resellers involves several risks, including the following:

	•		we may not be able to adequately train partners and resellers to sell and service our products;
	•		they may emphasize competitors’ products or decline to carry our products; and
	•		channel conflict may arise between other third parties and/or our internal sales staff.

Our industry is characterized by frequent technological change. If we are unable to adapt our products and develop new products to keep up with these rapid changes, we will not be able to obtain or maintain market share.

     The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in customer needs, heavy competition and frequent new product introductions. If we fail to develop new products or modify or improve existing products in response to these changes in technology, customer demands or industry standards, our products could become less competitive or obsolete.

     We must respond to changing technology and industry standards in a timely and cost-effective manner. We may not be successful in using new technologies, developing new products or enhancing existing products in a timely and cost effective manner. These new technologies or enhancements may not achieve market acceptance. Our pursuit of necessary technology may require substantial time and expense. We may need to license new technologies to respond to

technological change. These licenses may not be available to us on terms that we can accept. Finally, we may not succeed in adapting our products to new technologies as they emerge.

Our future success depends on key personnel and our ability to attract and retain additional personnel.

     Our key personnel include:

	•		Jeffrey C. Mack, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President;
	•		John A. Witham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
	•		Christopher F. Ebbert, Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer; and
	•		Scott W. Koller, Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing.

     If we fail to retain our key personnel or to attract, retain and motivate other qualified employees, our ability to maintain and develop our business may be adversely affected. Our future success depends significantly on the continued service of our key technical, sales and senior management personnel and their ability to execute our growth strategy. The loss of the services of our key employees could harm our business. We may in the future be unable to retain our employees or to attract, assimilate and retain other highly qualified employees who could migrate to other employers who offer competitive or superior compensation packages.

Our ability to execute our business strategy depends on our ability to protect our intellectual property, and if any third parties make unauthorized use of our intellectual property, or if our intellectual property rights are successfully challenged, our competitive position and business could suffer.

     Our success and ability to compete depends substantially on our proprietary technologies. We regard our copyrights, service marks, trademarks, trade secrets and similar intellectual property as critical to our success, and we rely on trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements with our employees, customers and others to protect our proprietary rights. Despite our precautions, unauthorized third parties might copy certain portions of our software or reverse engineer and use information that we regard as proprietary. No U.S. or international patents have been granted to us. As of May 1, 2007, we had applied for three U.S. patents, but we cannot provide assurance that they will be granted. Even if they are granted, our patents may be successfully challenged by others or invalidated. In addition, any patents that may be granted to us may not provide us a significant competitive advantage. We have been granted trademarks, but they could be challenged in the future. If future trademark registrations are not approved because third parties own these trademarks, our use of these trademarks would be restricted unless we enter into arrangements with the third party owners, which might not be possible on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we fail to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights successfully, our competitive position could suffer. We may be required to spend significant resources to monitor and police our intellectual property rights. We may not be able to detect infringement and may lose competitive position in the market. In addition, competitors may design around our technology or develop competing technologies. Intellectual property rights may also be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries, which could make it easier for competitors to capture market share.

Our industry is characterized by frequent intellectual property litigation, and we could face claims of infringement by others in our industry. Such claims are costly and add uncertainty to our business strategy.

     The digital media and communications industry is characterized by uncertain and conflicting intellectual property claims and frequent intellectual property litigation, especially regarding patent rights. We could be subject to claims of infringement of third party intellectual property rights, which could result in significant expense and could ultimately result in the loss of our intellectual property rights. From time to time, third parties may assert patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business. In addition, because

patent applications in the United States are not publicly disclosed until the patent is issued, applications may have been filed which relate to our industry of which we are not aware. We may in the future receive notices of claims that our products infringe or may infringe intellectual property rights of third parties. Any litigation to determine the validity of these claims, including claims arising through our contractual indemnification of our business partners, regardless of their merit or resolution, would likely be costly and time consuming and divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel. If any such litigation resulted in an adverse ruling, we could be required to:

	•		pay substantial damages;
	•		cease the manufacture, use or sale of infringing products;
	•		discontinue the use of certain technology; or
	•		obtain a license under the intellectual property rights of the third party claiming infringement, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all.

     MediaTile Company USA has informed us that it filed a patent application in June 2005 related to the use of cellular technology for delivery of digital content. We currently use cellular technology to deliver digital content on a limited basis. While MediaTile has not alleged that our products infringe its rights, they may do so in the future.

Our business may be adversely affected by malicious applications that interfere with, or exploit security flaws in, our products and services.

     Our business may be adversely affected by malicious applications that make changes to our customers’ computer systems and interfere with the operation and use of our products. These applications may attempt to interfere with our ability to communicate with our customers’ devices. The interference may occur without disclosure to or consent from our customers, resulting in a negative experience that our customers may associate with our products. These applications may be difficult or impossible to uninstall or disable, may reinstall themselves and may circumvent other applications’ efforts to block or remove them. In addition, we offer a number of products and services that our customers download to their computers or that they rely on to store information and transmit information over the Internet. These products and services are subject to attack by viruses, worms and other malicious software programs, which could jeopardize the security of information stored in a customer’s computer or in our computer systems and networks. The ability to reach customers and provide them with a superior product experience is critical to our success. If our efforts to combat these malicious applications fail, or if our products and services have actual or perceived vulnerabilities, there may be claims based on such failure or our reputation may be harmed, which would damage our business and financial condition.

We could have liability arising out of our previous sales of unregistered securities.

     Prior to our initial public offering, we financed our development and operations with proceeds from the sale to accredited investors of debt and equity securities. These securities were not registered under federal or state securities laws because we believed such sales were exempt under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and under Regulation D under the Securities Act. In addition, we issued stock purchase warrants to independent contractors and associates as compensation or as incentives for future performance. We have received no claim that such sales were in violation of securities registration requirements under such laws, but should a claim be made, we would have the burden of demonstrating that sales were exempt from such registration requirements. In addition, it is possible that a purchaser of our securities could claim that disclosures to them in connection with such sales were inadequate, creating potential liability under the anti-fraud provisions of federal and state securities or other laws. If successful, claims under such laws could require us to pay damages, perform rescission offers, and/or pay interest on amounts invested and attorneys’ fees and costs. Depending upon the magnitude of a judgment against us in any such actions, our financial condition and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

We compete with other companies that have more resources, which puts us at a competitive disadvantage.

     The market for digital signage software is highly competitive and we expect competition to increase in the future. Some of our competitors or potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than our company. These competitors may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than our company.

     We expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to introduce new products, services and technologies. Successful new product introductions or enhancements by our competitors could reduce sales and the market acceptance of our products, cause intense price competition or make our products obsolete. To be competitive, we must continue to invest significant resources in research and development, sales and marketing and customer support. If we do not have sufficient resources to make these investments or are unable to make the technological advances necessary to be competitive, our competitive position will suffer. Increased competition could result in price reductions, fewer customer orders, reduced margins and loss of market share. Our failure to compete successfully against current or future competitors could seriously harm our business.

In the event we elect to expand our business through acquisitions, we cannot assure that such future acquisitions, if pursued and consummated, will be advantageous or profitable.

     We may determine to grow through acquisitions of technologies, products or businesses. However, no acquisitions are currently being negotiated and no portion of our capital resources has been allocated to specific acquisitions. Nevertheless, we may complete future acquisitions using a portion of our capital resources, through issuances of equity securities which could be dilutive, or through the incurrence of debt which could contain restrictive covenants. In addition, acquisitions may result in significant amortization expenses related to intangible assets. Such methods of financing could adversely affect our earnings. Acquisitions also may involve numerous other risks, including difficulties in assimilating the operations and products or services of an acquired business, the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, risks of entering markets in which we have limited or no direct prior experience, the potential loss of key employees of an acquired business and difficulties in attracting additional key employees necessary to manage acquired operations. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in integrating any business acquired in the future. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will pursue or consummate future acquisitions or that any acquisitions, if consummated, will be advantageous or profitable for our company.

Risks Related to Our Securities

We must implement additional finance and accounting systems, procedures and controls in order to satisfy requirements applicable to public companies, which will increase our costs and divert management’s time and attention.

     As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements and corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ.

     As an example of reporting requirements, we continue to evaluate our internal control systems in order to allow management to report on our internal control over financing reporting beginning with our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2007, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to our internal control over financing reporting beginning with our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2008, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As a company with limited capital and human resources, we anticipate that more of management’s time and attention will be diverted from our business to ensure compliance with these regulatory requirements than would be the case with a company that has established controls and procedures. This diversion of

management’s time and attention could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

     In the event we identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we cannot remediate in a timely manner, or if we are unable to receive a positive attestation from our independent registered public accounting firm with respect to our internal control over financial reporting, investors and others may lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements and the trading price of our common stock and ability to obtain any necessary equity or debt financing could suffer. In addition, in the event that our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to rely on our internal control over financial reporting in connection with its audit of our financial statements, and in the further event that it is unable to devise alternative procedures in order to satisfy itself as to the material accuracy of our financial statements, and related disclosures, it is possible that we would be unable to file our annual report with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which could also adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and our ability to secure any necessary additional financing, and could result in the delisting of our common stock from NASDAQ and the ineligibility of our common stock for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board. In that event, the liquidity of our common stock would be severely limited and the market price of our common stock would likely decline significantly.

     In addition, the new rules could make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors, on Board committees or as executive officers.

Our management has broad discretion over the use of the remaining net proceeds from our initial public offering as well as the net proceeds of our proposed public offering and may apply the proceeds in ways that do not improve our operating results or increase the value of our common stock.

     Our management has significant discretion in the use of the remaining net proceeds of our initial public offering and the net proceeds of our proposed public offering. Accordingly, our investors will not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and other relevant information that we may consider in the application of such net proceeds. Therefore, it is possible that we may allocate such net proceeds in ways that fail to improve our operating results, increase the value of our common stock or otherwise maximize the return on these proceeds.

If we fail to comply with the NASDAQ requirements for continued listing, our common stock could be delisted from NASDAQ, which could hinder our investors’ ability to obtain timely quotations on the price of our common stock, or trade our common stock in the secondary market.

     Our common stock must sustain a minimum bid price of at least $1.00 per share and we must satisfy the other requirements for continued listing on NASDAQ. In the event our common stock is delisted from NASDAQ, trading in our common stock could thereafter be conducted in the over-the-counter markets in the so-called pink sheets or the OTC Bulletin Board. In such event, the liquidity of our common stock would likely be impaired, not only in the number of shares which could be bought and sold, but also through delays in the timing of the transactions, and there would likely be a reduction in the coverage of our company by securities analysts and the news media, thereby resulting in lower prices for our common stock than might otherwise prevail.

The market price of our stock may be subject to wide fluctuations.

     The price of our common stock may fluctuate, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. These fluctuations could cause our investors to lose part or all of their investment in our shares of common stock. Factors that could cause fluctuations include, but are not limited to, the following:

	•		price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
	•		significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of companies in our industry;
	•		actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or in the expectations of financial market analysts;
	•		investor perceptions of our industry, in general, and our company, in particular;
	•		the operating and stock performance of comparable companies;
	•		general economic conditions and trends;
	•		major catastrophic events;
	•		loss of external funding sources;
	•		sales of large blocks of our stock or sales by insiders; or
	•		departures of key personnel.

Our directors, executive officers and the Spirit Lake Tribe together may exercise significant control over our company.

     As of May 1, 2007, our directors, executive officers and the Spirit Lake Tribe, which is a selling shareholder in our proposed public offering, beneficially owned approximately 19.2% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Following the sale of securities offered in our proposed public offering, assuming that all shares offered thereunder are sold, our directors, executive officers and the Spirit Lake Tribe will beneficially own 6.7% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, these shareholders, if acting together, may be able to influence or control matters requiring approval by our shareholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other extraordinary transactions. They may also have interests that differ from our other investors and may vote in a way with which such investors disagree and which may be adverse to such investors’ interests. The concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of our company, could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.

Our articles of incorporation, bylaws and Minnesota law may discourage takeovers and business combinations that our shareholders might consider in their best interests.

     Anti-takeover provisions of our articles of incorporation, bylaws and Minnesota law could diminish the opportunity for shareholders to participate in acquisition proposals at a price above the then current market price of our common stock. For example, while we have no present plans to issue any preferred stock, our Board of Directors, without further shareholder approval, may issue up to 16,666,666 shares of undesignated preferred stock and fix the powers, preferences, rights and limitations of such class or series, which could adversely affect the voting power of our common stock. In addition, our bylaws provide for an advance notice procedure for nomination of candidates to our Board of Directors that could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control. Further, as a Minnesota corporation, we are subject to provisions of the Minnesota Business Corporation Act, or MBCA, regarding “control share acquisitions” and “business combinations.” We may, in the future, consider adopting additional anti-takeover measures. The authority of our board to issue undesignated preferred stock and the anti-takeover provisions of the MBCA, as well as any future anti-takeover measures adopted by us, may, in certain circumstances, delay, deter or prevent takeover attempts and other changes in control of our company not approved by our Board of Directors.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our shares of common stock in the foreseeable future.

     We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our shares of common stock. We intend to retain any future earnings to fund the operation and expansion of our business and, therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our shares of common stock in the foreseeable future. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be the sole source of gain for investors in our common stock for the foreseeable future.

A substantial number of shares will be eligible for future sale by our current investors and the sale of those shares could adversely affect our stock price.

     If our existing shareholders sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market after the contractual lock-up and other legal restrictions discussed below lapse, the trading price of our common stock could be adversely effected.

     Our directors, executive officers and certain other shareholders have agreed not to sell, offer to sell, contract to sell, pledge, hypothecate, grant any option to purchase, transfer or otherwise dispose of, grant any rights with respect to, or file or participate in the filing of a registration statement, except the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or establish or increase a put equivalent position or liquidate or decrease a call equivalent position within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, or be the subject of any hedging, short sale, derivative or other transaction that is designed to, or reasonably expected to lead to, or result in, the effective economic disposition of, or publicly announce his, her or its intention to do any of the foregoing with respect to, any shares of common stock, or any securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, any shares of common stock for a period of 360 days, or 180 days in the case of shareholders other than our directors and executive officers, after November 28, 2006, the date of the final prospectus related to our initial public offering, without the prior written consent of the underwriter of our initial public offering. Our directors, executive officers and the Spirit Lake Tribe, which is a selling shareholder in our proposed public offering, further agreed to such restrictions for a period of 180 days beyond the date of the final prospectus of our proposed public offering (subject to possible extension). In addition, as required by certain state securities regulators, our directors and officers placed their equity securities in our company in escrow at the closing of our initial public offering.

     Commencing May 29, 2007, 2,528,630 shares of our outstanding common stock, 1,328,880 shares underlying warrants and 81,000 shares underlying options became eligible for sale in the public market, and 1,928,667 additional shares of our outstanding common stock, 1,111,986 additional shares underlying warrants and 848,330 additional shares underlying options will become eligible for sale commencing upon the first to occur of November 23, 2007 or the expiration of the lock-up agreements applicable to our directors, executive officers and the Spirit Lake Tribe in connection with our proposed public offering. Substantially all of the foregoing shares and shares underlying warrants are registered for resale under the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. If these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections entitled “Prospectus summary,” “Risk factors,” “Use of proceeds,” “Management’s discussion and analysis or plan of operation” and “Business.” These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements about:

	•		our estimates of future expenses, revenue and profitability;
	•		trends affecting our financial condition and results of operations;
	•		our ability to obtain customer orders;
	•		the availability and terms of additional capital;
	•		our ability to develop new products;
	•		our dependence on key suppliers, manufacturers and strategic partners;
	•		industry trends and the competitive environment;
	•		the impact of losing one or more senior executive or failing to attract additional key personnel; and
	•		other factors referenced in this prospectus, including those set forth under the caption “Risk factors.”

     In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. We discuss many of these risks in this prospectus in greater detail under the heading “Risk factors.” Given these uncertainties, you should not attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

     Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

USE OF PROCEEDS

     The shares being registered under this prospectus for resale by the selling shareholders include outstanding shares of common stock and shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants, certain of which have exercises prices in excess of the market price of our common stock. The proceeds from the offering are going to the selling shareholders only. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling shareholders. We will receive the exercise price of the warrants held by the selling shareholders, if any, when such warrants are exercised, assuming the exercise price is paid in cash, by the selling shareholders. If we realize proceeds from the exercise of all of these warrants, assuming the exercise price is paid in cash, the net proceeds to us would be approximately $11.3 million. We expect to use the proceeds of any such warrant exercises for general working capital purposes. We are unable to further specify such use of proceeds given the uncertainty surrounding when or whether we will receive any such proceeds.

CAPITALIZATION

     The following table sets forth our capitalization as of March 31, 2007. The following table does not include any adjustment that may result from our proposed public offering described elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read the information below in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes and “Management’s discussion and analysis or plan of operation” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

		March 31, 2007
Current portion of capital lease obligation		$	105,405
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion			132,447
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock — 16,666,666 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding			—
Common stock, $.01 par value — 50,000,000 shares authorized, 9,835,621 shares issued and outstanding			98,356
Additional paid-in capital			49,684,429
Accumulated deficit			(36,484,278	)
Accumulated and other comprehensive income			44,265
Total shareholders’ equity			13,342,772
Total capitalization		$	13,580,624

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

     You should read the summary financial data below in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes and with “Management’s discussion and analysis or plan of operation” included elsewhere in this prospectus. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 are derived from our audited financial statements that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The statement of operations data for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2007 and the balance sheet data as of March 31, 2007 are derived from our unaudited financial statements that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The balance sheet data as of March 31, 2007 does not include any adjustment that may result from our proposed public offering described elsewhere in this prospectus.

										Three Months Ended
		Years Ended December 31,								March 31,
		2005				2006				2006				2007
Statement of Operations Data:
Sales		$	710,216			$	3,145,389			$	601,566			$	196,436
Cost of sales(1)			939,906				1,545,267				227,190				103,263
Selling, general and administrative			2,889,230				5,042,635				1,423,214				2,381,238
Research and development expenses			881,515				875,821				233,605				249,431
Termination of partnership agreement			—				—				—				653,995
Interest and other expenses/(income)			789,490				10,469,403				650,200				(140,926	)
Net loss		$	(4,789,925	)		$	(14,787,737	)		$	(1,932,643	)		$	(3,050,565	)
Loss per common share		$	(7.18	)		$	(9.71	)		$	(2.46	)		$	(0.31	)
Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding			666,712				1,522,836				784,130				9,832,288
		December 31,				December 31,								March 31,
		2005				2006								2007
Balance Sheet Current assets		$	768,187			$	16,999,503							$	14,774,399
Total assets			1,313,171				17,545,927								15,403,373
Current liabilities			7,250,478				1,652,687								1,928,154
Non-current liabilities			1,668,161				155,456								132,447
Total liabilities			8,918,639				1,808,143								2,060,601
Shareholders’ equity (deficit)		$	(7,605,468	)		$	15,737,784							$	13,342,772

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

     Our common stock has been quoted on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “RNIN” since November 27, 2006. We intend to apply for listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “RNIN” assuming we meet the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Market following our proposed public offering. The following table sets forth the approximate high and low sales price for our common stock for the period indicated as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

Period		High				Low
Fourth Quarter 2006		$	7.18			$	3.50
First Quarter 2007		$	9.05			$	5.40

     As of May 1, 2007, we had 215 shareholders of record and approximately 1,600 beneficial owners.

     We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to operate and expand our business, and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR
PLAN OF OPERATION

     The following discussion of our historical results of operations and our liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed in “Risk factors” elsewhere in this prospectus.

The Services We Provide

     We provide dynamic digital signage solutions targeting specific retail and service markets through a suite of software applications collectively called RoninCast. RoninCast is an enterprise-level content delivery system that manages, schedules and delivers digital signage content over wireless or wired networks. Our solution, a digital alternative to static signage, provides our customers with a dynamic visual marketing system designed to enhance the way they advertise, market and deliver their messages to targeted audiences. Our technology can be combined with interactive touch screens to create new platforms for conveying marketing messages. We have installed more than 800 digital signage systems in over 275 locations since the introduction of RoninCast in January 2003.

Our Sources of Revenue

     We generate revenue through system sales, license fees and separate service fees, including consulting, training, content development and implementation services, as well as ongoing customer support and maintenance, including product upgrades. We currently market and sell our software and service solutions through our direct sales force and value added resellers. We generated revenue of $710,216 and $3,145,389 in the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. We generated revenue of $196,436 in the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Our Expenses

     Our expenses primarily comprise three categories: sales and marketing, research and development and general and administrative. Sales and marketing expenses include salaries and benefits for our sales associates and commissions paid on successful sales. This category also includes amounts spent on the hardware and software we use to prospect new customers, including those expenses incurred in trade shows and product demonstrations. Our research and development expenses represent the salaries and benefits of those individuals who develop and maintain our software products including RoninCast and other software applications we design and sell to our customers. Our general and administrative expenses consist of corporate overhead, including administrative salaries, real property lease payments, salaries and benefits for our corporate officers and other expenses such as legal and accounting fees.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., or GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In recording transactions and balances resulting from business operations, we use estimates based on the best information available. We use estimates for such items as depreciable lives, volatility factors in determining fair value of option grants, tax provisions, provisions for uncollectible receivables and deferred revenue. We revise the recorded estimates when better information is available, facts change or we can determine actual amounts. These revisions can affect operating results. We have identified below the following accounting policies that we consider to be critical.

Revenue Recognition

     We recognize revenue primarily from these sources:

	•		Software and software license sales
	•		System hardware sales
	•		Content development services
	•		Training and implementation
	•		Maintenance and support contracts

     We apply the provisions of Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP 98-9 “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions” to all transactions involving the sale of software license. In the event of a multiple element arrangement, we evaluate if each element represents a separate unit of accounting taking into account all factors following the guidelines set forth in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21 (“EITF 00-21”) “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”.

     We recognize revenue when (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred, which is when product title transfers to the customer, or services have been rendered; (3) customer payment is deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies and significant uncertainties; and (4) collection is probable.

     Multiple-Element Arrangements — We enter into arrangements with customers that include a combination of software products, system hardware, maintenance and support, or installation and training services. We allocate the total arrangement fee among the various elements of the arrangement based on the relative fair value of each of the undelivered elements determined by vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”). In software arrangements for which we do not

have VSOE of fair value for all elements, revenue is deferred until the earlier of when VSOE is determined for the undelivered elements (residual method) or when all elements for which we do not have VSOE of fair value have been delivered.

     We have determined VSOE of fair value for each of our products and services. The fair value of maintenance and support services is based upon the renewal rate for continued service arrangements. The fair value of installation and training services is established based upon pricing for the services. The fair value of software and licenses is based on the normal pricing and discounting for the product when sold separately. The fair value of its hardware is based on a stand-alone market price of cost plus margin.

     Each element of our multiple element arrangement qualifies for separate accounting with the exception of undelivered maintenance and service fees. We defer revenue under the residual method for undelivered maintenance and support fees included in the price of software and amortize fees ratably over the appropriate period. We defer fees based upon the customer’s renewal rate for these services.

Software and software license sales

     We recognize revenue when a fixed fee order has been received and delivery has occurred to the customer. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable and free of contingencies based upon signed agreements received from the customer confirming terms of the transaction. Software is delivered to customers electronically or on a CD-ROM, and license files are delivered electronically. We assess collectibility based on a number of factors, including the customer’s past payment history and its current creditworthiness. If it is determined that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer the revenue and recognize it at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash payment. If an acceptance period is required, revenue is recognized upon the earlier of customer acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period.

System hardware sales

     We recognize revenue on system hardware sales generally upon shipment of the product to the customer. Shipping charges billed to customers are included in sales and the related shipping costs are included in cost of sales.

Professional service revenue

     Included in services and other revenue are revenue derived from implementation, maintenance and support contracts, content development and training. The majority of consulting and implementation services and accompanying agreements qualify for separate accounting. Implementation and content development services are bid either on a fixed-fee basis or on a time-and-materials basis. Substantially all of our contracts are on a time-and-materials basis. For time-and-materials contracts, we recognize revenue as services are performed. For a fixed-fee contract, we recognize revenue upon completion of specific contractual milestones or by using the percentage of completion method.

     Training revenue is recognized when training is provided.

Maintenance and support revenue

     Included in services and other revenue are revenue derived from maintenance and support. Maintenance and support consists of software updates and support. Software updates provide customers with rights to unspecified software product upgrades and maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support period. Support includes access to technical support personnel for software and hardware issues.

     Maintenance and support revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance contract, which is typically one to three years. Maintenance and support is renewable by the customer. Rates for maintenance and support,

including subsequent renewal rates, are typically established based upon a specified percentage of net license fees as set forth in the arrangement.

Basic and Diluted Loss per Common Share

     Basic and diluted loss per common share for all periods presented is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Basic weighted average shares outstanding include only outstanding common shares. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average common and potential dilutive common shares outstanding computed in accordance with the treasury stock method. Shares reserved for outstanding stock awards, options, warrants and convertible notes are not considered because the impact of the incremental shares is antidilutive.

Deferred Income Taxes

     Deferred income taxes are recognized in the financial statements for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates. Temporary differences arise from net operating losses, reserves for uncollectible accounts receivables and inventory, differences in depreciation methods, and accrued expenses. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

     In the first quarter of 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123R), which revises SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123) and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB 25). SFAS 123R requires that share-based payment transactions with employees be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value and recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period. Prior to SFAS 123R, we disclosed the pro forma effects of SFAS 123 under the minimum value method. We adopted SFAS 123R effective January 1, 2006, prospectively for new equity awards issued subsequent to January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 123R for the year ended December 31, 2006 resulted in the recognition of stock-based compensation expense of $787,214. No tax benefit has been recorded due to the full valuation allowance on deferred tax assets that we have recorded.

     Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with provisions of APB 25, and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation — an Interpretation of APB No. 25”, and complied with the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transaction and Disclosure” (SFAS 148). Under APB 25, compensation expense is based on the difference, if any, on the date of the grant, between the fair value of our stock and the exercise price of the option. We amortized deferred stock-based compensation using the straight-line method over the vesting period.

     SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure” (SFAS No. 148), defines a fair value method of accounting for issuance of stock options and other equity instruments. Under the fair value method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123, companies were not required to adopt the fair value method of accounting for employee stock-based transactions. Companies were permitted to account for such transactions under APB 25, but were required to disclose in a note to the financial statements pro forma net loss and per share amounts as if a company had applied the fair methods prescribed by SFAS 123. We applied APB Opinion 25 and related interpretations in accounting for the stock awards granted to employees and directors and have complied with the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 and SFAS 148.

     All stock awards granted by us have an exercise or purchase price equal to or above market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, had compensation cost for the grants issued by us been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for grants consistent with the fair value method of SFAS 123, our cash flows would have remained unchanged; however, net loss and loss per common share would have been increased for the year ended December 31, 2005 to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

Net loss:		$	(4,789,925	)
As reported			—
Add: Employee compensation expense included in net loss
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards			(13,880	)
Pro forma		$	(4,803,805	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
As reported		$	(7.18	)
Pro forma		$	(7.21	)

     The fair value of each award is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (minimum value method), assuming no expected dividends and the following assumptions:

		2005 Grants				2006 Grants
Expected volatility factors			n/a				61.7	%
Approximate risk free interest rates			5.0	%			5.0	%
Expected lives		5 Years				5 Years

     The determination of the fair value of all awards is based on the above assumptions. Because additional grants are expected to be made each year and forfeitures will occur when employees leave us, the above pro forma disclosures are not representative of pro forma effects on reported net income (loss) for future years. See “Note O” of the financial statements for years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 for more information regarding our stock-based compensation plans.

     We account for equity instruments issued for services and goods to non-employees under SFAS 123; EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”; and EITF 00-18, “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees”. Generally, the equity instruments issued for services and goods are for shares of our common stock or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. These shares or warrants generally are fully-vested, nonforfeitable and exercisable at the date of grant and require no future performance commitment by the recipient. We expense the fair market value of these securities over the period in which the related services are received.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2007

     Our results of operations and changes in certain key statistics for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2007 were as follows:

		March 31
		2006				2007
Sales		$	601,566			$	196,436
Cost of sales			227,190				103,263
Gross profit			374,376				93,173
Sales and marketing expenses			430,904				624,649
Research and development expenses			233,605				249,431

		March 31
		2006				2007
General administrative expenses			992,310				1,756,589
Termination of partnership agreement			—				653,995
Operating expenses			1,656,819				3,284,664
Operating loss			(1,282,443	)			(3,191,491	)
Other income (expenses):
Interest expense			(479,083	)			(10,881	)
Loss on debt modification			(171,954	)			—
Interest income			204				153,298
Other			633				(1,491	)
			(650,200	)			140,926
Net loss		$	(1,932,643	)		$	(3,050,565	)

Sales

     Our sales decreased $405,130 or 67% from first quarter 2006 to first quarter 2007. The decrease in revenue was due primarily to when we received orders and when all elements required for revenue recognition were met. In the first quarter of 2006, we recognized previously deferred revenue of $236,000 for a restaurant industry license as a result of signing a new agreement with the customer in March 2006. We were unable to recognize and therefore deferred $907,083 of revenue for projects billed but not completed as of March 31, 2007.

Cost of Sales

     Our cost of sales decreased $123,927, or 55% from first quarter 2006 to first quarter 2007. The decrease in cost of sales was a direct result of the decrease in recognized revenue in first quarter 2007.

Operating Expenses

     Our operating costs increased $1,627,845, or 98% from first quarter 2006 to first quarter 2007. The two largest factors in this increase were the termination of a partnership agreement for $653,995 and the compensation expense associated with stock options in the amount of $222,452, which are included in line item “Operating expenses.” The other increases in operating costs included salaries and related costs totaling $479,397, directly related to our increase in headcount from 29 to 38 associates. We also increased our advertising costs by $149,396 as a result of tradeshow participation and the continued marketing of RoninCast. Our expenses also increased due to higher professional fees of $122,605 largely due to the expense of being a public entity and growth of our business.

     On February 13, 2007, we terminated a strategic partnership agreement with Marshall Special Assets Group, Inc. (“Marshall”), a company that provides financing services to the Native American gaming industry, by signing a Mutual Termination, Release and Agreement. We paid $653,995 in consideration of the termination of all rights under the strategic partnership agreement and in full satisfaction of any further obligations under the strategic partnership agreement. Going forward, we will pay a fee in connection with sales of our software and hardware to customers, distributors and resellers for use exclusively in the ultimate operations of or for use in a lottery (“End Users”). Under such agreement, we will pay a percentage of the net invoice price for the sale of our software and hardware to End Users, in each case collected by us on or before February 12, 2012, with a minimum annual payment of $50,000 for three years. We will be reimbursed for 50% of the costs and expenses incurred by us in relation to any test installations involving sales or prospective sales to End Users.

Interest Expense

     Interest expense decreased $468,202 from first quarter 2006 to first quarter 2007. The decrease in interest expense was due to lower debt levels in the first quarter 2007 from first quarter 2006. We either converted or paid off all outstanding debt as of December 31, 2006 with the exception of capital leases.

Interest Income

     Interest income increased $153,094 from first quarter 2006 to first quarter 2007. The increase in interest income was due to significantly higher cash balances as a result of our initial public offering in November 2006.

Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006

     Our results of operations and changes in certain key statistics for the calendar years ended 2005 and 2006 were as follows:

		December 31,
		2005				2006
Sales		$	710,216			$	3,145,389
Cost of sales			939,906				1,545,267
Gross profit			(229,690	)			1,600,122
Sales and marketing expenses			1,198,629				1,462,667
Research and development expenses			881,515				875,821
General administrative expenses			1,690,601				3,579,968
Operating expenses			3,770,745				5,918,456
Operating loss			(4,000,435	)			(4,318,334	)
Other income (expenses):
Interest expense			(804,665	)			(10,124,216	)
Loss on debt modification			—				(367,153	)
Interest Income			1,375				21,915
Sundry			13,800				51
			(789,490	)			(10,469,403	)
Net loss		$	(4,789,925	)		$	(14,787,737	)

Sales

     Our sales increased $2,435,173, or 343% from 2005 to 2006. The increase in revenue was the result of expansion of new and existing customers for the sales of our products and services. In addition we recognized $736,000 of license fees from two strategic relationships that were deferred in previous years.

Cost of Sales

     Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $939,906. Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $1,545,267, which included inventory write downs of $37,410. The inventory write downs during 2005 amounted to $390,247. Cost of sales increased $605,361, or 64% from 2005 to 2006. The cost of sales increase was primarily attributable to increased system hardware sales.

Operating Expenses

     Our operating costs increased $2,147,711, or 57% from 2005 to 2006. The single largest factor in this increase was salaries, commissions and related costs totaling $1,606,430. We also increased our advertising costs by $140,587 as a result of tradeshow participation and the continued marketing of RoninCast. Our expenses also increased due to higher professional fees of $304,373 largely due to the expense of being a public entity and growth of our business.

Interest Expense

     Interest expense increased by $9,319,551 from 2005 to 2006. We also incurred a loss on debt modification of $367,153. The increase in interest expense was due to higher debt levels in 2006 versus 2005. These debt instruments included a coupon cost and non-cash accounting expense for debt discounts and beneficial conversion. Required cash payments for

interest were $2.2 million for 2006, including accrued interest at December 31, 2006, and the remaining interest expense was primarily warrant valuation and beneficial conversion. The loss on debt modification related to a 2006 modification to outstanding debt to provide longer liquidity than was originally anticipated.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating Activities

     We do not currently generate positive cash flow. Our investments in infrastructure have been greater than sales generated to date. As of March 31, 2007, we had an accumulated deficit of $36,484,278. The cash flow used in operating activities was $3,384,874 and $4,959,741 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. The cash flow used in operating activities was $1,060,575 and $2,164,459 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. At the end of first quarter 2007, we had signed purchase orders or agreements for installations we expect to complete during 2007 of approximately $14.5 million. Recognition of revenue related to these purchase orders and agreements is subject to delivery or successful installation.

Investing Activities

     Using a portion of the net proceeds from our initial public offering (described below), we purchased $7,176,779 of marketable securities during the year ended December 31, 2006 and $1,499,439 of marketable securities during the three months ended March 31, 2007. Such marketable securities consisted of debt securities issued by federal government agencies with maturity dates in 2007.

Financing Activities

     We have financed our operations primarily from sales of common stock and the issuance of notes payable to vendors, shareholders and investors. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, we generated $3,691,931 and $20,586,247 from these activities, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, we generated $2,338,723 and $8,085 from these activities, respectively.

     As of March 31, 2007, we did not have any significant debt, with the exception of capital leases. We plan to use our available cash to fund operations, which includes the continued development of our products, infrastructure and attraction of customers.

     On November 30, 2006, we sold 5,175,000 shares of our common stock at $4.00 per share in our initial public offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form SB-2, which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 27, 2006. We obtained approximately $18.4 million in net proceeds as a result of such offering. As a result of the closing of such offering, we also issued the following unregistered securities on November 30, 2006:

•

We sold to the underwriter of our initial public offering for $50 a warrant to purchase 450,000 shares of our common stock exercisable at $4.80 per share. The warrant is not exercisable during the first 360 days after the date of the final prospectus from our initial public offering (November 28, 2006) and expires on the fourth anniversary of issuance. The warrant contains customary anti-dilution provisions and certain demand and participatory registration rights. The warrant may not be sold, transferred, assigned or hypothecated for a period of one year from the date of the final prospectus from our initial public offering, except to officers or partners of the underwriter of our initial public offering and members of that offering’s selling group and/or their officers or partners.

	•		Pursuant to the terms of convertible debenture agreements which we entered into with the Spirit Lake Tribe, a federally recognized Native American tribe, our indebtedness to the Spirit Lake Tribe incurred in 2005 aggregating $3,000,000 automatically converted into 1,302,004 shares of common stock.
	•		Pursuant to various note conversion agreements with 21 holders of convertible notes or debentures, an aggregate of $2,029,973 principal amount of notes was automatically converted into 634,362 shares of our common stock. In addition, we issued 40,728 common shares in lieu of the payment of accrued interest in the amount of $130,344 due to certain holders of such notes and debentures.

     On December 30, 2006, we issued 1,798,611 shares of common stock to holders of 12% convertible bridge notes upon the conversion of $5,413,429 principal amount and $342,126 in accrued interest on such notes. The remaining 12% convertible bridge notes not converted in the principal amount of $335,602 and accrued interest of $70,483 were repaid in cash. We were obligated to repay the notes within 30 days of the closing of our initial public offering, which occurred on November 30, 2006.

     On May 15, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 with the SEC relating to a proposed public offering of up to 4,450,000 shares of common stock, including the underwriters’ over-allotment option and 1,000,000 shares offered by Spirit Lake Tribe. Spirit Lake Tribe is a federally recognized Native American tribe and a beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. Mr. Carl B. Walking Eagle Sr., a director, is an officer and member of the Spirit Lake Tribal Council. On June 11, 2007, we amended the foregoing registration statement to cover 4,600,000 shares of common stock, including the underwriters’ over-allotment option and 1,000,000 shares offered by Spirit Lake Tribe.

     On February 13, 2007, we terminated our strategic partnership agreement with Marshall Special Assets Group, Inc. (“Marshall”) by signing a Mutual Termination, Release and Agreement. By entering into the Mutual Termination, Release and Agreement, we regained the rights to directly control our sales and marketing process within the gaming industry and will obtain increased margins in all future digital signage sales in such industry. Pursuant to the terms of the Mutual Termination, Release and Agreement, we paid Marshall an aggregate amount equal to the sum of (i) $500,000 and (ii) $153,995 (representing a return of 12% per annum accrued through the date of termination on amounts previously paid by Marshall to us under the strategic partnership agreement), in consideration of the termination of all of Marshall’s rights under the strategic partnership agreement and in full satisfaction of any further obligations to Marshall under the strategic partnership agreement. The termination payment of $653,995 was recognized as a charge to our first quarter 2007 earnings. Pursuant to the Mutual Termination, Release and Agreement, we will pay Marshall a fee in connection with sales of our software and hardware to customers, distributors and resellers for use exclusively in the ultimate operations of or for use in a lottery (“End Users”). Under such agreement, we will pay Marshall (i) 30% of the net invoice price for the sale of our software to End Users, and (ii) 2% of the net invoice price for the sale of hardware to End Users, in each case collected by us on or before February 12, 2012, with a minimum annual payment of $50,000 for three years. Marshall will pay 50% of the costs and expenses incurred by us in relation to any test installations involving sales or prospective sales to End Users. For further information regarding our relationship with Marshall, please review “Business — Agreement with Marshall Special Assets Group, Inc.”

     On March 23, 2007, we contracted with an outside consulting firm to provide implementation assistance in connection with a new accounting system, customer relationship management software, and Sarbanes-Oxley documentation and testing. We anticipate spending approximately $200,000 on these services during 2007.

     We believe we can continue to develop our sales to a level at which we will become cash flow positive. Based on our current and anticipated expense levels, existing capital resources and the net proceeds of our proposed public offering, we anticipate that our cash will be adequate to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months.

2007 Outlook

     At the end of first quarter 2007, we had signed purchase orders or agreements for installations we expect to complete during 2007 of approximately $14.5 million. Recognition of revenue related to these purchase orders and

agreements is subject to delivery or successful installation. We expect sales for the full year 2007 to be in the range of $18 million to $21 million and continue to target our gross margin at 40% or higher.

Contractual Obligations

Operating and Capital Leases

     We lease certain equipment under three capital lease arrangements. The leases require monthly payments in the aggregate of $11,443, including interest imputed at 16% to 22% per year through December 2009.

     We lease approximately 8,610 square feet of office and warehouse space located in Eden Prairie, Minnesota under a five-year operating lease that extends through November 30, 2009. The monthly lease obligation is currently $6,237 and adjusts annually with monthly payments increasing to $6,560 in August 2009. In addition, we lease additional warehouse space of approximately 2,160 square feet. This lease expires in September 2007 and has a monthly payment obligation of $1,350.

     We lease equipment under a non-cancelable operating lease that requires monthly payments of $441 through December 2008.

     The following table summarizes our obligations under contractual agreements as of March 31, 2007 and the time frame within which payments on such obligations are due.

		Payments due by period
Contractual Obligations		Total				Less than One Year				One to Three Years				Three to Five Years				More than Five Years
Capital lease obligations, including interest		$	287,904			$	102,988			$	184,916			$	—			$	—
Operating lease obligations		$	227,026			$	72,433			$	154,593			$	—			$	—
Total obligations		$	514,930			$	175,421			$	339,509			$	—			$	—

     On April 26, 2007, we entered into a lease arrangement for additional office space. The lease commences on July 9, 2007. The lease is for 67 months for approximately 19,000 square feet located in Minnetonka, Minnesota. The lease contains financial terms that adjust over time. We expect our payments during the lease terms, including the expenses of maintaining such leased facility, to total approximately $1.5 million. We are currently attempting to sub-lease our present facility. For further information on such lease agreement, please review “Properties.”

     On June 11, 2007, we executed a statement of work with Spanlink Communications, Inc. relating to the acquisition of a communications system for a new office location. The statement of work specifies a Cisco Unified Communications system, including hardware, software and services in connection with the installation and maintenance of the system, and arises out of a proposal from Spanlink and a master services agreement signed by the parties in April 2007. Brett A. Shockley, one of our directors, is the President, Chairman, a Director and principal shareholder of Spanlink Communications, Inc. We estimate that the amount of the contract will be $206,000. We believe the communication system to be acquired from Spanlink and the cost thereof to be competitive with systems that could be provided by unrelated parties.

     Based on our working capital position at March 31, 2007, we believe we have sufficient working capital to meet our current operating and lease obligations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) 20, “Accounting Changes.” The new standard generally requires retrospective treatment (restatement of comparable prior period information) rather than a cumulative effect adjustment for the effect of a change in accounting principle or method of application. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2006.

     In September 2005, the FASB approved EITF Issue 05-8, “Income Tax Consequences of Issuing Convertible Debt with a Beneficial Conversion Feature” (EITF 05-8). EITF 05-8 provides (1) that the recognition of a beneficial

conversion feature creates a difference between book basis and tax basis of a convertible debt instrument, (2) that basis difference is a temporary basis for which a deferred tax liability should be recorded, and (3) the effect of recognizing the deferred tax liability should be charged to equity in accordance with SFAS No. 109. EITF 05-8 was effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2005. We applied EITF 05-8 to the 2006 issuance of convertible debt and had no differences in book and tax basis and no deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2006. We reduced our net operating loss carryover and valuation allowance by approximately $2.3 million for the non-deductibility of the beneficial conversion feature recorded in 2006. When the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets reverses, we will record a $2.3 million tax benefit related to the beneficial conversion feature with a corresponding decrease to additional paid-in capital.

     In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (“FIN 48”) an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 requires that a position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not (i.e. a likelihood of more than 50%) that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also requires expanded disclosures including identification of tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next 12 months, a description of tax years that remain subject to examination by a major tax jurisdiction, a tabular reconciliation of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning and end of each annual reporting period, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate and the total amounts of interest and penalties recognized in the statements of operations and financial position. FIN 48 will be effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The recognition and measurement requirements under FIN 48 had no impact on our existing tax positions upon adoption on January 1, 2007.

     In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB 108). SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. Under SAB 108, registrants should quantify errors using both a balance sheet and income statement approach (dual approach) and evaluate whether either approach results in a misstatement that is material when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered. We adopted SAB 108 on December 31, 2006. The adoption had no impact on our financial position or results of operations.

BUSINESS

History

     Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation incorporated on March 23, 2000. Originally we sought to apply our proprietary wireless technology in the information device space and focused on an “industrial strength” personal digital assistant. We recognized that we lacked the financial and operating strength to compete in the general market and instead targeted niche markets, but we were unable to gain market acceptance for this type of application. Beginning in the fall of 2002, we designed and developed RoninCast^®. The first release of RoninCast was in the spring of 2003.

     In November 2006, we sold 5,175,000 shares of our common stock at $4.00 per share in our initial public offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form SB-2.

     On May 15, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 with the SEC relating to a proposed public offering of up to 4,450,000 shares of common stock, including the underwriters’ over-allotment option and 1,000,000 shares offered by Spirit Lake Tribe. Spirit Lake Tribe is a federally recognized Native American tribe and a beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. Mr. Carl B. Walking Eagle Sr., a director, is an officer and member of the Spirit Lake Tribal Council.

General

     We provide dynamic digital signage solutions targeting specific retail and service markets. Through a suite of software applications marketed as RoninCast, we provide an enterprise-level content delivery system that manages, schedules and delivers digital content over wireless or wired networks. Additionally, RoninCast’s flexibility allows us to develop custom solutions for specific customer applications.

Business Strategy

     Our objective is to be the premier provider of dynamic digital signage systems to customers in our targeted retail and service markets. To achieve this objective, we intend to pursue the following strategies:

     Focus on Vertical Markets. Our direct sales force focuses primarily on the following vertical market segments: in-store, gaming and hospitality, specialized services and public spaces. To attract and influence customers, these markets continue to seek new mediums that provide greater flexibility and visual impact in displaying content. We focus in markets where we believe our solution offers the greatest advantages in functionality, implementation and deployment over traditional media advertising.

     Leverage Strategic Partnerships and Reseller Relationships. We have a partnership and reseller relationship with Richardson Electronics. We also seek to develop and leverage relationships with additional market participants to integrate complementary technologies with our solutions. We believe that such strategic partnerships will enable access to emerging new technologies and standards and increase our market presence. We plan to continue developing and expanding reseller relationships with firms or individuals who possess key market positions or industry knowledge.

     Market and Brand Our Products and Services Effectively. Our key marketing objective is to establish RoninCast as an industry standard in the dynamic digital signage industry. Our marketing initiatives convey the distinguishing and proprietary features of our products, including wireless networking, centralized content management and custom software solutions.

     Our strategy has included establishing a strong presence at national trade shows, such as NADA (National Auto Dealership Association), Globalshop, Digital Signage Expo and InfoComm. Globalshop is a U.S. trade show focused on

the in-store shopping experience. The Digital Signage Expo, a trade show dedicated solely to digital signage products, attracts attendees from a variety of markets, including retail, financial, hospitality and public spaces. InfoComm is a trade show for the professional audio/video and information communications industry.

     We also participate in more than 10 other trade shows annually together with our resellers. For example, we attend the International Retail Design Conference as the Presenting Sponsor, giving us the ability to connect directly with top retail brands. These trade shows provide an ideal venue for product introduction and engaging with key retailers. We continually evaluate our strategies to determine which trade show presence best serves our marketing objectives.

     Outsource Non-Specialized Operating Functions. We outsource certain non-specialized support functions such as system installation, fixturing, integration and technical field support. In addition, we purchase from manufacturers such items as stands, mounts, custom enclosures, monitors and computer hardware. We believe that our expertise in managing complex outsourcing relationships improves the efficiency of our digital signage solutions, and allows us to focus on our core competencies.

     Create Custom Solutions. Although RoninCast is an enterprise solution designed for an array of standard applications, we also develop custom systems that meet the specific business needs of our customers. As digital signage technology continues to evolve we believe that creating custom solutions for our customers is one of the primary differentiators of our value proposition.

     Develop New Products. Developing new products and technologies is critical to our success. Increased acceptance of digital signage will require technological advancements to integrate it with other systems such as inventory control, point-of sale and database applications. In addition, digital media content is becoming richer and we expect customers will continue to demand more advanced requirements for their digital signage networks. We intend to continue to listen to our customers, analyze the competitive landscape and continually improve our products.

Industry Background

     Digital Signage. We provide digital signage for marketing and advertising purposes across a variety of industry verticals. Total advertising expenditures within the United States were approximately $264 billion in 2004 according to Advertising Age’s Special Report: Profiles Supplement — 50th Annual 100 Leading National Advertisers Report. Within this aggregate expenditure, we participate in a digital signage segment focusing primarily on marketing or advertising targeted to specific retail and service markets.

     The use of digital signage is expected to grow significantly over the next several years. Frost & Sullivan has estimated that the size of the North American digital signage advertising market, comprising advertising revenue from digital signage networks, was $102.5 million in 2004 and forecasts the market to reach $3.7 billion in 2011, a compound annual growth rate of 67%.

     Frost & Sullivan also estimates that expenditures for digital signage systems, including displays, software, software maintenance, media players, design, installation, and networking services, were $148.9 million in 2004, and the market is forecast to reach $856.9 million by 2011, a compound annual growth rate of 28%.

     Growth of Digital Signage. We believe there are four primary drivers to the growth of digital signage:

•

Changes in the advertising landscape. With the introduction of personal video recorders (PVRs) and satellite radio, we believe retailers, manufacturers and advertising firms are struggling with ways to present their marketing message effectively. A recent article in Infomercial Media states that PVRs (TiVo, for example) will be in over 30% of US homes within the next five years. Although viewers are watching 20-30% more television, they are using PVR technology to bypass as much as 70% of the commercials. In addition, satellite

radio continues to grow in popularity with limited and/or commercial free programming. We believe the use of digital signage will continue to grow as advertisers seek alternatives to traditional media.

	•		Growing awareness that digital signage is more effective. Research presented at the 2005 Digital Signage Business conference shows that digital signage receives up to 10 times the eye contact of static signage and, depending upon the market, may significantly increase sales for new products that are digitally advertised. A study by Arbitron, Inc. found that 29% of the consumers who have seen video in a store say they bought a product they were not planning on buying after seeing the product featured on the in-store video display. We believe that our dynamic digital signage solutions provide a valuable alternative to advertisers currently using static signage.
	•		Decreasing hardware costs associated with digital signage. The high cost of monitors has been an obstacle of digital signage implementation for a number of years. The price of digital display panels has been falling due to increases in component supplies and manufacturing capacity. As a result, we believe that hardware costs are likely to continue to decrease, resulting in continued growth in this market. We employ digital displays from a variety of manufacturers. This independence allows us to give our customers the hardware their system requires while taking advantage of improvements in hardware technology, pricing reductions and availability. We partner with several key hardware vendors, including NEC, Richardson Electronics, (Pixelink), LG, Hewlett Packard and Dell.
	•		Compliance and effectiveness issues with traditional point-of-purchase signage. Our review of the current market indicates that most retailers go through a tedious process to produce traditional static point-of-purchase and in-store signage. They create artwork, send such artwork to a printing company, go through a proof and approval process and then ship the artwork to each store. According to an article appearing in The Retail Bulletin (February 19, 2006), it is estimated that less than 50% of all static in-store signage programs are completely implemented once they are delivered to stores. We believe our signage solution can enable prompt and effective implementation of retailer signage programs, thus significantly improving compliance and effectiveness.

The RoninCast Solution

     RoninCast is a digital alternative to static signage that provides our customers with a dynamic visual marketing system designed to enhance the way they advertise, market, deliver and update their messages to targeted audiences. For example, our technology can be combined with interactive touch screens to create new platforms for assisting with product selection and conveying marketing messages. An example of this is the interactive, touch screen kiosk we designed for shoppers at stores where Sealy mattresses are sold. RoninCast enables us to deliver a turn-key solution that includes project planning, innovative design services, network deployment, software training, equipment, hardware configuration, content development, implementation, maintenance, 24/7 help desk support and a full service network operations center.

     Our software manages, schedules, and delivers dynamic digital content over wired or wireless networks. Our solution integrates proprietary software components and delivers content over proprietary communication protocols.

     RoninCast is an enterprise software solution which addresses changes in advertising dynamics and other traditional methods of delivering content. We believe our product provides benefits over traditional static signage and assists our customers in meeting the following objectives of a successful marketing campaign.

     In May 2007, we established a full service, manned 24/7 network operations center in Minneapolis, Minnesota, supported by a redundant center in Des Moines, Iowa. Our operators send schedules and content, gather data from the field, flag and elevate field issues and handle customer calls. The servers in both locations communicate in real-time with

the devices deployed at our customer locations. We estimate that this design provides us a disaster recovery time of less than an hour.

Features and benefits of the RoninCast system include:

	•		Centrally Controlled. RoninCast empowers the end-user to distribute content from one central location. As a result, real-time marketing decisions can be managed in-house ensuring retailers’ communication with customers is executed system-wide at the right time and the right place. Our content management software recognizes the receipt of new content, displays the content, and reports back to the central location(s) that the media player is working properly.
	•		Wireless Delivery. RoninCast can distribute content within an installation wirelessly. RoninCast is compatible with current wireless networking technology and does not require additional capacity within an existing network. RoninCast uses Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) or wireless data connections to establish connectivity. By installing or using an existing onsite WLAN, RoninCast can be incorporated throughout the venue without any environmental network cabling. We also offer our cellular communications solution for off-site signage where WLAN is not in use or practical.
	•		Ease and Speed of Message Delivery. Changing market developments or events can be quickly incorporated into our system. The end-user may create entire content distributions on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. Furthermore, the system allows the end-user to interject quick daily updates to feature new or overstocked items, and then automatically return to the previous content schedule.
	•		Data Collection. Through interactive touch screen technology, RoninCast software can capture user data and information. This information can provide feedback to both the customer and the marketer. The ability to track customer interaction and data mine user profiles, in a non-obtrusive manner, can provide customers feedback that would otherwise be difficult to gather.
	•		Integrated Applications. RoninCast can integrate digital signage with other applications and databases. RoninCast is able to use a database feed to change the content or marketing message, making it possible for our customers to deliver targeted messages. Data feeds can be available either internally within a business or externally through the Internet. For example, our customers can specify variable criteria or conditions which RoninCast will analyze, delivering marketing content relevant to the changing environment.
	•		Scalability/Mobility. By utilizing a wireless network, the RoninCast system provides the ability to easily move signage or “scale-up” to incorporate additional digital signage. Displays can be moved to or from any location under a wireless network. Customers are able to accommodate adds/moves/changes within their environment without rewiring network connections. And when the customer wants to add additional digital signage, only electrical power needs to be supplied at the new location.
	•		Compliance/Consistency. RoninCast addresses compliance and consistency issues associated with print media and alternative forms of visual marketing. Compliance measures the frequency of having the marketing message synchronized primarily with product availability and price. Compliance issues cause inconsistencies in pricing, product image and availability, and store polices. RoninCast addresses compliance by allowing message updates and flexible control of a single location or multiple locations network-wide. RoninCast allows our customers to display messages, pricing, images, and other information on websites that are identical to those displayed at retail locations.
	•		Network Control. Each remote media player is uniquely identified and distinguished from other units as well as between multiple locations. RoninCast gives the end-user the ability to view the media player’s status to determine if the player is functioning properly and whether the correct content is playing. A list of all units on

the system is displayed allowing the end-user to view single units or clusters of units. The system also allows the end-user to receive information regarding the health of the network before issues occur. In addition, display monitors can be turned on or off remotely.

Industry Recognition

     In March 2007, our SealyTouch^TM product designed for Sealy Corporation won the Silver Outstanding Merchandizing Achievement Award in the Digital Signage category from Point of Purchase Advertising International. This awards contest recognizes the most innovative and effective marketing at-retail displays and programs that improve sales and make products memorable and enticing to consumers.

     Also, our projects for Zia Sleep Sanctuary and Canterbury Park received awards at the Digital Signage Expo in May 2007. Digital Signage Expo is a trade show solely dedicated to digital signage products. Zia Sleep Sanctuary won the Retail Store award and Canterbury Park won for its installation at the Minneapolis airport in the Environmental Design Integration category.

Our Markets

     We generate revenue through system sales, license fees and separate service fees for consulting, training, content development and implementation services, and for ongoing customer support and maintenance. We currently market and sell our software and service solutions through our direct sales force and value added resellers. We have reseller relationships with Richardson Electronics, Wand Corporation, Sign Biz, Inc., BigEye Productions and Brookview Technologies.

	•		Richardson Electronics is a global provider of “engineered solutions” serving the radio frequency and wireless communications, industrial power conversion, medical imaging, security and display systems markets. The company’s core capabilities include product manufacturing, systems integration, prototype design and manufacture, testing and logistics. Richardson, a public company which has been in business since 1947, has a worldwide customer base of more than 135,000 and a presence in 46 countries.
	•		Ward Corporation has over 20 years of experience as a point-of-sale solutions provider for the quick-serve restaurant industry. The Wand solution provides the technology needed to run a quick service restaurant including hardware, software, point-of-sale, technical support, central office, back office, polling, integration, Internet connectivity, open architecture, custom reports, executive dashboard and digital menus.
	•		Sign Biz, Inc., which was established in 1989, operates in the field of computer-aided signmaking. Its program, LobbyPOP, offers an exclusive point-of-purchase program that builds upon the growing trend for the use of digital media in signage and promotion. The Sign Biz chain of 170+ LobbyPOP dealers offers LobbyPOP branding packages to small businesses. LobbyPOP dealers are trained in the technologies of “deco-advertising” including floor, wall, color, sound and multimedia systems to enhance the small business environment. Sign Biz fully engages in the digital imaging arena with a program that includes media content, interior design, sound, and installation services from one point-of-contact.
	•		BigEye Productions, founded in 1996, is a web design and Internet hosting company located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. BigEye offers website design, online publishing and online surveys. BigEye’s newest technology offerings include digital signage using the RoninCast software to offer clients a complete digital marketing solution. As a reseller of RoninCast, BigEye manages the content design, updating and network management needs of its clients.

     Brookview Technologies provides projection displays using transparent screens that can perform in high ambient light environments, maintain a wide viewing angle and can be used as interactive touch screens. Brookview is the distributor in the U.S. and Canada of the HoloProTM and ViP Interactive brands. As a reseller of RoninCast, Brookview can now offer its clients centralized control of the content displayed on their projection screens.

     We market to companies that deploy point-of-purchase advertising or visual display systems and whose business model incorporates marketing, advertising, or delivery of messages. Typical applications are retail and service business locations that depend on traditional static point-of-purchase advertising. We believe that any retail businesses promoting a brand or advertisers seeking to reach consumers at public venues are also potential customers. We believe that the primary market segments for digital signage include:

     Retail. General retailers typically have large stores offering a variety of goods and services. This vertical market consistently faces the challenge of improving customer traffic as the size of the stores increases. It is estimated that a typical customer’s shopping cycle is once every two weeks for about 1.5 hours per visit. Furthermore, retailers also understand the need to compete with online shopping by offering a source for products that are becoming more popular for purchases via the Internet. Retailers are also concerned about the demographic shopping cycle. Customers from different demographic groups shop at different times of the day and week. The challenge is to set the store and its promotions to fit the various demographic customers, their respective shopping patterns and cycles, and to offer services that more effectively compete with electronic venues. Retailers also have difficulty with point-of-purchase compliance. Once static signage is created, printed and shipped, retailers face the challenge to get individual stores to install the point-of-purchase advertising in the proper place and at the proper time, and to remove it at the right time. In some instances, retailers see less than 50% compliance on an individual store level.

     Hospitality. Hospitality venues offer an array of opportunities for digital signage. For example, in the gaming and casino environment, entertainers and events often require signage to be developed, installed and removed on a frequent basis. RoninCast allows for centralized control and scheduling of all content, which provides a more efficient and manageable system. Additionally, casino and gaming facilities offer a variety of non-gaming services, such as spas, restaurants, shopping malls and convention halls. These facilities attempt to raise guest awareness of multiple products and services in an attractive and informative manner. Casinos may also have a need for off-site advertising, such as at airports or arenas, to drive traffic from these venues to their facilities. RoninCast with mobile communications enables the use of in-house signage to be used for off-site applications.

     We believe that restaurants also offer opportunities for digital signage within the hospitality industry. Indoor advertising in restrooms, curbside pick-up, waiting areas and menu boards are areas in which digital signage can be incorporated. For example, most walk through restaurants use backlit fixed menu systems. These are time consuming and expensive to change, leaving the restaurant with a menu fare that is fixed for a period of time. Additionally, restaurants offer different menus at different times of the day making the menu cluttered and difficult for the customer to follow. RoninCast allows for “real-time” scheduling of menu board items throughout the day with prices and selections changing based on a user-defined schedule.

     Specialized Services. The healthcare and banking industries both have specific customer waiting areas and are information-driven. By incorporating digital signage programs, these institutions can promote products and disseminate information more effectively. In addition, digital signage can reduce perceived wait times by engaging patients or customers with relevant marketing messages and information.

     Public Spaces. Public spaces such as convention centers, transportation locations and arenas present opportunities for digital signage applications. Convention centers welcome millions of visitors per year for a variety of events. Airports offer another opportunity for digital signage. These potential customers using RoninCast, along with mobile communications, can control messages remotely from their central headquarters without requiring an onsite communication network.

Our Customers

     Historically, our business has been dependent upon a few customers. Our goal is to broaden and diversify our customer base. We have installed more than 800 digital signage systems in over 275 locations since the introduction of RoninCast in January 2003. During the first several months of 2007, our customers have included the following:

	•		Reuters Limited — In June 2007, we entered into a master services agreement with Reuters Limited to manage and maintain Reuter’s InfoPoint network at digital signage locations in and outside of the United States. The InfoPoint network is a lifestyle, news, information and pictures-based digital signage display network designed for the out-of-home market. The network is designed for public spaces, lobbies, waiting areas and walk ways. Our RoninCast digital signage software will be supplied to Reuters through our reseller partner, Richardson Electronics, for up to 1,000 units at Reuters locations by 2010. Reuters is the world’s largest international multimedia news agency, providing investing news, world news, business news, technology news, headline news, small business news via the internet, video, mobile and interactive television platforms. We will provide system support to Reuters’ network on a 24-hour per day, 7-day per week and 365 days per year basis.
	•		NewSight Corporation — Following a proposal submitted to and accepted by NewSight Corporation, we were authorized in February 2007 to implement digital signage systems, including our RoninCast software, for NewSight’s initial rollout of network installations in 19 large, upscale malls. These network installations will begin in the first half of 2007. In addition, we will work with NewSight to implement its launch, installation and ongoing operation of an initial rollout of a digital signage network in physicians’ offices throughout the U.S., consisting of a waiting room display network to educate patients on medical procedures and provide office information. We will provide hardware procurement, project management and installation for both the mall and physicians’ office digital signage installations. NewSight also authorized us to develop software for its patented 3-D platform.
	•		Carnival Cruise Lines — Carnival Cruise Lines has installed RoninCast on two of its newest ships, Carnival Freedom and Costa Serena as of March 2007 and May 2007, respectively. Carnival has installed more than 20 displays into the casino areas to advertise upcoming events, showcase jackpot winners, and communicate jackpot totals in real-time.

     In aggregate, the customers listed below represent 17.9% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 35.3% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2006.

	•		Sealy Corporation — We entered into a sale and purchase agreement with Sealy Corporation in July 2006. During 2005, we worked with Sealy to develop the SealyTouch system, which is an in-store, interactive shopping and training aid for mattress customers and retail associates. Sealy distributes its products through approximately 2,900 dealers at approximately 7,000 locations. Sealy purchased 50 SealyTouch systems in 2006. We have agreed to work with Sealy on an exclusive basis in the bedding manufacture and retail field and will be Sealy’s exclusive vendor for these systems during the three-year term of the agreement, assuming Sealy’s satisfaction of minimum order requirements described below, and contingent upon the successful conclusion of Sealy’s system beta testing and the parties entering into a master services agreement and certain other related agreements. Our commitment to work with Sealy on an exclusive basis is subject to Sealy ordering either: (i) 250 SealyTouch systems per calendar quarter beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2007, or (ii) a total of 2,000 systems deliverable in quantities of at least 250 systems per calendar quarter, commencing with the quarter ending June 30, 2007. The agreement, however, does not obligate Sealy to purchase a minimum number of systems. Sales to Sealy Corporation represented 11.4% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 4.9% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2005.
	•		Canterbury Park — We have installed RoninCast throughout the Canterbury Park gaming facility. In addition, Canterbury installed digital signage twenty-five miles away at the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport utilizing RoninCast with mobile communications. Both in-house and off-site digital signage is

controlled from one central location. Sales to Canterbury Park represented 0.1% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 8.9% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2005.

	•		BigEye Productions — BigEye Productions is a full service digital advertising firm located in Calgary, Alberta, that runs the RoninCast digital signage network for many of North America’s leading paint suppliers, including industry leaders Hirshfield’s in the Midwest and Miller Paint in the Northwest. BigEye creates custom signage networks for their customers to promote their various vendors, create related sales opportunities and reduce perceived wait time for their customers. Sales through BigEye represented 11.6% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2006. We had no sales to this customer in the year ended December 31, 2005.
	•		Foxwoods Resort Casino — Foxwoods is the largest casino in the world, with 340,000 square feet of gaming space in a complex that covers 4.7 million square feet. More than 40,000 guests visit Foxwoods each day. Foxwoods purchased RoninCast to control, administer and maintain marketing content on its property from its marketing headquarters in Norwich, Connecticut. Sales to Foxwoods Resort Casino represented 8.8% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 and no sales for the year ended December 31, 2005.
	•		Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority — By using our solution for wayfinding (touch screen technology), advertising and event scheduling, this digital signage installation exemplifies how digital signage can enhance an environment while providing advanced technology to control, administer and maintain marketing content from one centralized location. Sales to Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority represented 0.8% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2.4% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2005.
	•		Mystic Lake Casino and Resort — We have installed RoninCast displays for several applications, including off-site advertising at the Mall of America, Wall of Winners, promotion of casino winners, general kiosks and upcoming casino events. Sales to Mystic Lake Casino and Resort represented 1.0% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2006. We had no sales to this customer in the year ended December 31, 2005.
	•		University of Akron — The University uses RoninCast as an information system for students and faculty. Starting with a small installation footprint, the University continues to grow their digital signage network with recurring orders for expansion. Sales to the University of Akron represented 1.6% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 1.7% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Product Description

     RoninCast is a dynamic digital signage network solution that combines scalable, secure, enterprise-compliant, proprietary software with off the shelf or customer owned hardware. This integrated solution creates a network capable of controlling management, scheduling and delivery of content from a single location to an enterprise-level system.

     Master Controller (MC) — The MC is divided into two discrete operational components: the Master Controller Server (MCS) and the Master Controller Client (MCC). The MCS provides centralized control over the entire signage network and is controlled by operators through the MCC graphical user interface. Content, schedules and commands are submitted by users through the MCC to be distributed by the MCS to the End-Point Controllers. Additionally, through the MCS, network and content reports, and field data are viewed by operators utilizing the MCC.

     End-Point Controller (EPC) — The EPC receives content, schedules and commands from the centralized MCS. It then passes along the information to the End-Point Viewers in its local environment. Additionally, the EPC monitors the health of the local network and sends status reports to the MCS.

     End-Point Viewer (EPV) — The EPV software displays the content that has been distributed to it from the EPC or the Site Controller. It keeps track of the name of the content that is currently playing, and when and how many times it has played. This information is delivered back to the MCS through the EPC.

     Site Controller (SC) — The SC provides localized control and operation of an installation. It is able to deliver, broadcast, or distribute schedules and content. The level of control over these operations can be set at specific levels to allow local management access to some or all aspects of the network. The SC also allows information to be reviewed regarding the status of their local RoninCast network. It is also used as an installation and diagnostic tool.

     Network Builder (NB) — The NB allows operators to set up virtual networks of signage that create groups for specific content distribution. EPVs can be grouped by location, type, audience, or whatever method the user chooses.

     Schedule Builder (SB) — The SB provides users the ability to create schedules for extended content distribution. Schedules can be created for a day, a week, a month or a year at a time. These schedules are executed by the EPCs at the local level.

     Zone Builder (ZB) — The ZB allows screen space to be divided into discreet sections (zones) that can each play separate content. This allows reuse of media created from other sources, regardless of the pixel-size of the destination screen. Additionally, each zone can be individually scheduled and managed.

     RoninCast Wall (RCW) — The RCW provides the ability to synch multiple screens together to create complex effects and compositions such as an image moving from one screen to the next screen, or all screens playing new content at one time.

     Database Client (DBC) — The DBC allows for automation of control of the RoninCast network. Information can be retrieved from a database and sent to the EPVs automatically. This software is best suited for implementation where information changes on a regular basis, such as meeting room calendars or arrival and departure times, or data feeds from the Internet (for example, stock prices or sports scores).

     Event Log Viewer (EVL) — The EVL allows the user to easily analyze logs collected from the field in an organized manner. Filtering and sorting of data in any aspect further simplifies the analysis.

     Software Development Kit (SDK) — The SDK is provided so that customers can create their own custom applications that can interface with the RoninCast network. This provides the ultimate in flexibility for our customers who wish to create their own look-and-feel.

Key Components

     Key components of our solution include:

User-Friendly Network Control

     When managing the RoninCast network, the ability to easily and intuitively control the network is critical to the success of the system and the success of the customer. Customer input has been, and continues to be, invaluable in the design of the RoninCast Graphical User Interface. Everything from simple design decisions, such as menu layout, to advanced network communication, such as seeing the content play on a remote screen, is designed to be user-friendly and intuitive.

Diverse Media and Authoring Choices

     With the myriad of media design tools available today, it is vital that RoninCast stay current with the tools and technologies available. RoninCast started with Macromedia Flash, and while Flash remains a large percentage of content created and deployed, we have continued to innovate and expand the content options available. Today we offer Video (MPEG1, MPEG2, MPEG4, WMV, AVI), Macromedia Flash (SWF), still images (JPEG, BMP), and audio (MP3, WAV). As media technologies continue to emerge and advance, we also plan to expand the media choices for RoninCast.

Intelligent Content Distribution

     The size and complexity of the content being sent to digital displays are growing. In order for RoninCast to maintain network friendliness across wired and wireless connections, it is important that as few bytes as possible are sent. There are several ways that we enable this.

     The system utilizes a locally installed librarian that takes advantage of unused space on the hard-drive to track and manage content. Only files that are needed at the EPVs are transferred, saving on network bandwidth.

     RoninCast supports content transfer technologies other than one-to-one connections. One such technology is multicast satellite distribution. This is widely used in corporations such as big-box retailers that distribute large quantities of data to many locations.

     Often it is not the content itself that needs to be changed, but the information within the content that needs to be changed. If information updates are needed, instead of creating and sending a new content file, RoninCast can facilitate

the information swap. Through Macromedia Flash and the RoninCast Database Client, changing content information (instead of the content itself), can be facilitated through mechanisms such as Active Server Pages (PHP). This reduces updates from mega-bytes to the few bytes required to display a new time.

Distributed Management

     In order for RoninCast to be scalable to large organizations, it is necessary that each individual installation not burden the MC with everyday tasks that are required to manage a complex network. To this end, the MC offloads much of its work and monitoring to the EPCs. On the local network, the EPCs execute schedules, monitor EPVs, distribute content, and collect data. The only task that is required of the MC is to monitor and communicate with the EPCs. In this way, expansion of the RoninCast network by adding an installation does not burden the MC by the number of screens added, but only by the single installation.

Enterprise-Level Compatibility

     RoninCast software is designed to easily integrate into large enterprises and become part of suite of tools that are used every day. The RoninCast Server applications (MCS and EPC) run under Windows (2K, XP and 2K+ Server), and Linux server technology. In order to accommodate our customers’ network administrators, our software supports the ability to use PHP to create controlled, closed-loop interfaces for the RoninCast system.

Flexible Network Design

     One of the strengths of the RoninCast network is the ease and flexibility of implementation and expansion. RoninCast is designed to intelligently and successfully manage myriad connection options simultaneously both internally to an installation, and externally to the Internet.

     RoninCast can be networked using Wired LAN and/or Wireless LAN technology. With Wireless LAN, time and costs associated with installing or extending a hardwired network are eliminated. Wireless LAN offers customers freedom of installations and reconfigurations without the high costs of cabling. Additionally, a new installation can be connected to the Internet through dial-up/DSL telephone modems, wireless data communications or high-throughput enterprise data-pipes.

     In order to communicate with the MCS, a new installation can be connected to the Internet through dial-up/DSL telephone modems, digital mobile communication (such as CDMA or GPRS), or high-throughput enterprise data-pipes.

Security

     Essential to the design of RoninCast is the security of the network and hence the security of our customers. In order to provide the most secure installation possible, we address security at every level of the system: RoninCast communication, operating system hardening, network security and user interaction.

     RoninCast utilizes an unpublished proprietary communication protocol to communicate with members of the system. All information that is sent to or from a network member is encrypted with an industry standard 256-bit encryption scheme that is rated for government communication. This includes content for display as well as commands to the system, such as those for maintenance and data retrieval. Additionally, all commands are verified by challenge-response where the receiver of communication challenges the sender to prove that in fact it was sent from that sender, and not a potential intruder.

     In order for computers to be approved for use on the RoninCast network, their operating systems (whether Windows or Linux) go through a rigorous hardening process. This hardening removes or disables extraneous programs

that are not required for the core operation of RoninCast applications. The result is a significantly more stable and secure base for the system as a whole.

     Wireless and wired LAN each pose different levels of security and exposure. Wireless LAN has the most exposure to potential intruders. However, both can be accessed. In order to create a secure network we utilize high-level industry-standard wireless LAN equipment and configure it with the highest level of security. When necessary, we work with our customers, analyze their network security and will recommend back-end computer security hardware and software that will help make both their network and RoninCast network as secure as possible.

     RoninCast also uses a username/password mechanism with four levels of control so that access and functionality can be granted to a variety of users without having to give complete control to everyone. The four levels are separated into root (the highest level of control with complete access to the system), administrators (access that allows management of RoninCast’s hardware and software), operators (access that allows the management of the media playing), and auditors (access that is simply a “looking glass” that allows the viewing of device status, media playing, etc.). Additionally, in order to facilitate efficient management of access to the system, RoninCast will resolve usernames and password with the same servers that already manage a customer’s infrastructure.

Network Operations Center

     We offer a full service, manned 24/7 network operations center (NOC) in Minneapolis, Minnesota, supported by a redundant center in Des Moines, Iowa. The computers in both locations communicate in real-time with the devices deployed at our customer locations. We estimate that this design provides us a disaster recovery time of less than an hour.

     Our NOC operators send schedules and content, gather data from the field, flag and elevate field issues and handle customer calls. RoninCast’s dynamic nature allows our customers to purchase subscriptions at the level of service they desire. Some customers may want us to manage all aspects of their RoninCast network, whereas other customers may want us to monitor for field issues, but manage the schedules and content themselves.

     In addition to normal RoninCast management, customers can subscribe to dynamic data from the Internet, such as weather or stock quotes. This data is received by our servers and distributed to the desired End-Point Viewers in the field. Multiple language feeds can be supported with only the needed information arriving at each location. Due to the scalability of RoninCast, each Master Controller Server in the NOC can manage one or many customers.

Specialized Products

     Typical hardware in our solution includes a screen and a computer (with wireless antenna), and may include certain specialized hardware products including:

     U-Box — A display form factor consisting of an embedded processor with monitor for bathroom or other advertising applications.

     Table Sign — A form factor specifically designed for displaying advertising and informational content on gaming tables in a casino environment. The unit consists of an embedded processor that can be used with a variety of display sizes.

     Touch Screen Kiosks — An integrated hardware solution for interactive touch screen applications.

Our Suppliers

     Our principal suppliers include the following:

	•		Bailiwick Data Systems, Inc. and National Service Center (installation services);
	•		Samsung America, LG Electronics USA, NEC Display Solutions and Richardson Electronics Ltd. (monitors);
	•		Hewlett Packard Company, Dell USA, LP (computers); and
	•		Chief Manufacturing, Inc. (fixtures).

     In September 2006, we entered into a hardware partnership agreement with Richardson Electronics Ltd. that establishes pricing and procedures for our purchase of products, services and support that will allow us to focus on our core business of providing digital signage solutions. Although the agreement doesn’t require us to purchase minimum levels of products, services and support from Richardson or require Richardson to provide us with minimum levels of products, services or support, we expect that Richardson will be the primary supplier of our touch screen systems, provide consulting services regarding hardware selection and provide support for our installations. The term of this agreement is one year and will automatically renew for one-year terms unless terminated by either party on 30 days written notice.

Agreement with Marshall Special Assets Group, Inc.

     We intend to develop strategic alliances with various organizations that desire to incorporate RoninCast Technology into their products or services or who may market our products and services. We had entered into a strategic partnership agreement with The Marshall Special Assets Group, Inc. in May 2004. We had granted Marshall the right to be the exclusive distributor of our products to entities and companies and an exclusive license to our technology in the gaming and lottery industry throughout the world for an initial two-year term. In connection with such distribution arrangement, Marshall paid us $300,000 in May 2004 and $200,000 in October 2004. We recognized this revenue, which accounted for 15.9% of total sales, in the year ended December 31, 2006. On February 13, 2007, we terminated our strategic partnership agreement with Marshall by signing a Mutual Termination, Release and Agreement. By entering into the Mutual Termination, Release and Agreement, we regained the rights to directly control our sales and marketing process within the gaming industry and will obtain increased margins in all future digital signage sales in such industry. Pursuant to the terms of the Mutual Termination, Release and Agreement, we paid Marshall an aggregate amount equal to the sum of (i) $500,000 and (ii) $153,995 (representing a return of 12% per annum accrued through the date of termination on amounts previously paid by Marshall to us under the strategic partnership agreement), in consideration of the termination of all of Marshall’s rights under the strategic partnership agreement and in full satisfaction of any further obligations to Marshall under the strategic partnership agreement. The termination payment of $653,995 was recognized as a charge to our first quarter 2007 earnings. Pursuant to the Mutual Termination, Release and Agreement, we will pay Marshall a fee in connection with sales of our software and hardware to customers, distributors and resellers for use exclusively in the ultimate operations of or for use in a lottery (“End Users”). Under such agreement, we will pay Marshall (i) 30% of the net invoice price for the sale of our software to End Users, and (ii) 2% of the net invoice price for the sale of hardware to End Users, in each case collected by us on or before February 12, 2012, with a minimum annual payment of $50,000 for three years. Marshall will pay 50% of the costs and expenses incurred by us in relation to any test installations involving sales or prospective sales to End Users.

Ongoing Development

     Ongoing product development is essential to our ability to stay competitive in the marketplace as a solution provider. From the analysis and adoption of new communication technologies, to new computer hardware and display technologies, to the expansion of media display options, we are continually enhancing our product offering. We incurred research and development expenses of $881,515 in 2005, $875,821 in 2006 and $249,431 in the first three months of 2007.

Services

     We also offer consulting, project planning, design, content development, training and implementation services, as well as ongoing customer support and maintenance. Generally, we charge our customers for services on a fee-for-service basis. Customer support and maintenance typically is charged as a percentage of license fees and can be renewed annually at the election of our customers.

     Our services are integral to our ability to provide customers with successful digital signage solutions. Our industry-experienced associates work with customers to design and execute an implementation plan based on their business processes. We also provide our customers with education and training. Our training services include providing user documentation.

     We provide our customers with product updates, new releases, new versions and updates as part of our support fees. We offer 24/7 help desk support through our support center, which provides technical and product error reporting and resolution support.

Intellectual Property

     As of May 1, 2007, we had three U.S. patent applications pending relating to various aspects of our RoninCast delivery system. Two applications were filed in September 2004 and an additional application was filed in April 2007. Highly technical patents can take up to six years to issue and we cannot assure you that any patents will be issued, or if issued, that the same will provide significant protection to us.

     We currently have U.S. Federal Trademark Registrations for WIRELESS RONIN^® and RONIN CAST^®, and have an approved U.S. Registration application for RONINCAST and Design™ and an application for RONINCAST and Design™ in color is pending. As of May 1, 2007, we also had a registration in Europe a Community Trademark for RONINCAST^® and a pending Community Trademark application in Europe for RONINCAST and Design™. Federal trademark registrations continue indefinitely so long as the trademarks are in use and periodic renewals and other required filings are made.

     In February 2006, we received a letter from MediaTile Company USA, advising us that it filed a patent application in June 2005 relating solely and narrowly to the use of cellular delivery technology for digital signage. The letter contains no allegation of an infringement of MediaTile’s patent application. MediaTile’s patent application has not been examined by the U.S. Patent Office. Therefore, we have no basis for believing our systems or products would infringe any pending rights of MediaTile. We asked MediaTile in a responsive letter to keep us apprised of their patent application progress in the Patent Office.

     Pursuant to the terms of the Sale and Purchase Agreement between us and Sealy Corporation, dated July 11, 2006, we have granted to Sealy a limited, nontransferable, non-royalty bearing license to use our technology used in the SealyTouch System. Sealy’s rights in our technology pursuant to this license are expressly limited to Sealy’s use at specified locations in connection with the SealyTouch Systems we have sold to Sealy. We have agreed not to furnish our technology to any other bedding manufacturer or retailer in the United States, Canada or Mexico, provided Sealy meets certain minimum order requirements.

Competition

     The Weinstock Media Analysis study defined digital signage as server-based advertising over networked video displays. Using that definition, we are aware of several competitors, including 3M Digital Signage, Convergent, Clarity/CoolSign, Scala, Nanonation, Omnivex Corporation, BroadSign International and Impact Media. We are one of several companies competing in the digital signage industry and our products have not yet gained widespread customer acceptance. Although we have no access to detailed information regarding our competitors’ respective operations, some

or all of these entities may have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do and may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or changes in customer requirements. We also compete with standard advertising media, including print, television and billboards.

Regulation

     We are subject to regulation by various federal and state governmental agencies. Such regulation includes radio frequency emission regulatory activities of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, the consumer protection laws of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, product safety regulatory activities of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, and environmental regulation in areas in which we conduct business. Some of the hardware components which we supply to customers may contain hazardous or regulated substances, such as lead. A number of U.S. states have adopted or are considering “takeback” bills which address the disposal of electronic waste, including CRT style and flat panel monitors and computers. Electronic waste legislation is developing. Some of the bills passed or under consideration may impose on us, or on our customers or suppliers, requirements for disposal of systems we sell and the payment of additional fees to pay costs of disposal and recycling. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not determined that such legislation or proposed legislation will have a material adverse impact on our business.

Employees

     We refer to our employees as associates. As of May 1, 2007, we had 40 full-time associates employed in programming, networking, designing, training, sales/marketing and administration areas.

Properties

     We conduct our principal operations in a leased facility located at 14700 Martin Drive in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. We lease approximately 8,610 square feet of office and warehouse space under a five-year lease that extends through November 30, 2009. The monthly lease obligation is currently $6,237 and adjusts annually with monthly payments increasing to $6,560 in August 2009. In addition, we lease additional warehouse space of approximately 2,160 square feet at 14793 Martin Drive in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. This lease expires in September 2007 and has a monthly payment obligation of $1,350.

     On April 26, 2007, we entered into a lease agreement with the Utah State Retirement Investment Fund for office/warehouse space located at 5929 Baker Road, Suite 475 in Minnetonka, Minnesota. Effective July 9, 2007, we will lease 19,089 square feet of office space under a 67-month lease that extends through January 31, 2013. The monthly base rent obligation for the first lease year will be $13,680. This obligation adjusts annually, with monthly base rent payments for the second lease year increasing to $14,094. We will also be responsible for paying our pro rata share of the operating expenses of the facility, such as expenses incurred for management, operation, maintenance and repair of portions of the facility, taxes, and insurance on the property. Provided we are not in default, we will not be required to pay (1) gross rent for the first four months of the lease term and (2) base monthly rent for an additional three months of the lease term. The lease agreement defines default as the occurrence of certain events, including but not limited to, (a) our vacating or abandonment of the premises, (b) our failure to make a payment of rent and (c) our failure to perform any of the covenants and conditions of the lease agreement. The landlord has agreed to pay up to $276,790 towards certain leasehold improvements to the property. We have the right to receive an additional allowance of up to $75,000 towards the cost of such leasehold improvements, which additional allowance will be amortized into the monthly base rent at an interest rate of 8.5% per year over the primary term of the lease. During the term of the lease, we have the right of first offer with respect to certain additional space within the building. We have two options to extend the term of the lease, each for a period of three years, following the initial term of the lease. We also have an option to terminate the lease, effective the last day of the 48^th month of the term of the lease, provided we (1) provide the landlord with written notice of such termination on or before the end of the 39^th month of the term of the lease and (2) remit payment of the termination fee of $177,893, which fee may be increased to $201,719 if we have exercised our right to receive an additional allowance for leasehold improvements.

     In connection with our entry into the above-referenced lease agreement we provided a letter of credit to the landlord in the amount of $492,000, with such amount, assuming satisfaction of our obligations under the lease, reducing to $328,000 on January 1, 2009 and reducing further to $164,000 on January 1, 2010. The letter of credit is collateralized by $400,000 of our cash held by the issuing bank, which collateral is reduced over time as the letter of credit is reduced. The landlord may draw on the letter of credit if we default under the lease agreement, provided that the landlord certifies to the issuing bank (a) the specific nature of the default and (b) that it has provided us notice of such default and the opportunity to cure. So long as we are not in default under the lease agreement, the letter of credit will be released on the earlier of (a) January 1, 2011, or (b) after the 31^st month of the lease term if our EBITDA is $4.0 million or higher on a 10% profit margin.

     We are currently attempting to sub-lease our existing office space located at 14700 Martin Drive in Eden Prairie, Minnesota.

Legal Proceedings

     As of May 1, 2007, we were not party to any pending legal proceedings.

MANAGEMENT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

     The following table sets forth the name, age and positions of each of our directors and executive officers as of May 1, 2007:

								Independent
Name		Age				Position		Director
Jeffrey C. Mack			53			Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director		No
John A. Witham			55			Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		N/A
Christopher F. Ebbert			40			Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer		N/A
Scott W. Koller			45			Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing		N/A
Brian S. Anderson			52			Vice President and Controller		N/A
Dr. William F. Schnell (2)(3)			51			Director		Yes
Carl B. Walking Eagle Sr.			65			Director		Yes
Gregory T. Barnum (1)(2)(3)			51			Director		Yes
Thomas J. Moudry (1)(2)			46			Director		Yes
Brett A. Shockley (1)(3)			47			Director		Yes

Executive Officers

     Jeffrey C. Mack has served as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director since February 2003. From November 2000 through October 2002, Mr. Mack served as Executive Director of Erin Taylor Editions, an art distribution business. From July 1997 through September 2000, Mr. Mack served as Chairman, CEO and President of Emerald Financial, a recreational vehicle finance company. In January 1990, Mr. Mack founded and became Chairman, CEO and President of Arcadia Financial, LTD. (formerly known as Olympic Financial, LTD.), one of the largest independent providers of automobile financing in the United States. Mr. Mack left Olympic in August 1996. Mr. Mack filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Division of Minnesota, on February 16, 2001, and received a discharge on January 4, 2002.

     John A. Witham has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February 2006. From May 2002 through August 2004, Mr. Witham served as Chief Financial Officer of Metris Companies Inc. Prior to

joining Metris, Mr. Witham was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Bracknell Corporation from November 2000 to October 2001. In November 2001, Adesta Communications Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bracknell Corporation, voluntarily commenced a case under Chapter 11 of the United States Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Nebraska. In January 2002, State Group LTD, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bracknell Corporation, filed bankruptcy in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Mr. Witham was Chief Financial Officer of Arcadia Financial Ltd. from February 1994 to June 2000.

     Christopher F. Ebbert has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer since November 2000. From April 1999 to November 2000, Mr. Ebbert served as Senior Software Engineer for Digital Content, a 3D interactive gaming business. From February 1998 to April 1999, he served as Technical Director for Windlight Studios, a commercial 3D animation company. From December 1994 to February 1998, Mr. Ebbert served as Senior Software Engineer for Earth Watch Communications, a broadcast weather technologies company. From January 1990 to December 1994 he served as a Software Engineer and designed simulators for military use for Hughes Aircraft, an aerospace defense contractor.

     Scott W. Koller has served as Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing since February 2007. From November 2004 through January 2007, Mr. Koller served as our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing. From December 2003 to November 2004, Mr. Koller served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Rollouts Inc. From August 1998 to November 2003, Mr. Koller served in various roles with Walchem Corporation, including the last three years as Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mr. Koller served in the U.S. Naval Nuclear Power Program from 1985 to 1992.

     Brian S. Anderson has served as our Vice President, Controller and principal accounting officer since December 2006. From June 2005 to October 2005, Mr. Anderson served as a consultant to our company and as a consultant to GMAC RFC, a real estate finance company, from November 2005 to December 2006. From December 2000 to June 2005, Mr. Anderson served as the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary of Orbit Systems, Inc., a privately-held information technology company. From 1990 to June of 2000, Mr. Anderson served in positions of increasing responsibility with Arcadia Financial, Ltd., most recently as Senior Vice President-Corporate Controller. From 1988 to 1990, he served as Assistant Controller for Walden Leasing, Inc., a vehicle leasing company. From 1978 to 1988, he served in various accounting and tax positions of increasing responsibility with National Car Rental Systems, Inc., an international vehicle rental and commercial leasing company.

Directors

     Our Board of Directors currently consists of six members. The members of our Board of Directors serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders, or until their successors have been elected. In addition to complying with the independent director requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market, we have and will maintain at least two directors who satisfy the independence requirements set forth in the North American Securities Administrators Association Statement of Policy Regarding Corporate Securities Definitions. Our Board of Directors has an Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

     Jeffrey C. Mack. See biography above.

     William F. Schnell joined our Board of Directors in July 2005. Dr. Schnell also serves on the Board of Directors of National Bank of Commerce. Since 1990, Dr. Schnell has been an orthopedic surgeon with Orthopedic Associates of Duluth, and currently serves as its President.

     Carl B. Walking Eagle Sr. joined our Board of Directors in July 2005. Since 1981, Mr. Walking Eagle has served as Vice Chairman of the Spirit Lake Tribal Council. See “Certain relationships and transactions and corporate governance.”

     Gregory T. Barnum joined our Board of Directors in February 2006. Since February 2006, Mr. Barnum has been Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer for Datalink Corporation. From July 1997 to June 2005, Mr. Barnum was Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of CNT Corporation. Prior to employment with CNT Corporation, he served as Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Tricord Systems, Inc. and held similar senior financial positions with Cray Computer Corporation and Cray Research, Inc. Mr. Barnum is a member of the Board of Directors of Electric City Corporation and serves as a member of its Audit Committee.

     Thomas J. Moudry joined our Board of Directors in March 2006. Since December 2005, Mr. Moudry has been Chief Executive Officer and Chief Creative Officer of Martin Williams Advertising, Inc., a subsidiary of Omnicom Group, Inc., an advertising and marketing company. Prior to his current position at Martin Williams, Mr. Moudry served as such company’s President and Executive Creative Director from June 2005 to December 2005 and such company’s Executive Vice President and Creative Director from July 2003 to June 2005. From April 2000 to May 2003, Mr. Moudry was Executive Vice President and Executive Creative Officer of Omnicom Group Inc.

     Brett A. Shockley joined our Board of Directors in March 2006. Since January 2002, Mr. Shockley has been Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Spanlink Communications. From August 2000 to December 2001, Mr. Shockley was Vice President-General Manager of the Customer Contact Business Unit of Cisco Systems.

     There are no family relationships between our directors or executive officers.

Limitation of Liability, Indemnification and Commission Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities

     Under the Minnesota Business Corporation Act, our articles of incorporation provide that our directors shall not be personally liable for monetary damages to us or our shareholders for a breach of fiduciary duty to the full extent that the law permits the limitation or elimination of the personal liability of directors.

     Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     The following table shows, for our Chief Executive Officer and each of our two other most highly compensated executive officers, who are referred to as the named executive officers, information concerning compensation earned for services in all capacities during the year ended December 31, 2006.

Summary Compensation Table

														Change in
														Pension
												Non-Equity		Value and
												Incentive		Non-qualified
								Stock		Option		Plan		Deferred		All Other
Name and				Salary				Awards		Awards		Compensation		Compensation		Compensation		Total
Principal Position		Year		($)(1)		Bonus ($)		($)(2)		($)(2)		($)		Earnings ($)		($)(3)		($)
Jeffrey C. Mack Chairman, Chief, Executive Officer, President and Director		2006		171,769		100,000		—		173,747		—		—		804		446,320
John A. Witham Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2006		127,596		60,000		—		145,197		—		—		—		332,793
Scott W. Koller Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing		2006		169,425		30,000		—		48,128		—		—		—		247,553

Executive Employment Agreements

     We have Executive Employment Agreements with our current executive officers, Messrs. Mack, Witham, Ebbert and Koller, effective as of April 1, 2006. We also entered into an Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Anderson, effective as of December 13, 2006. The agreements are all for an initial term ending April 1, 2008, and will be automatically extended for successive one year periods unless either we or the officer elects not to extend employment. The annual base salary payable under these agreements may be increased, but not decreased, in the sole discretion of our Board. The initial annual base salaries are: Mr. Mack — $172,000; Mr. Witham — $137,000; Mr. Ebbert — $152,000; Mr. Koller — $137,000; and Mr. Anderson — $137,000. Mr. Mack became entitled to one-time $25,000 cash bonuses as a consequence of the completion of our initial public offering. Messrs. Witham and Ebbert received one-time cash bonuses upon the completion of our initial public offering in the amount of $20,000 each. Mr. Anderson is entitled to receive a performance-based cash award in 2007 of up to $25,000, based upon reaching agreed-upon goals and objectives. These agreements prohibit each officer from competing with us during his employment and for a period of time thereafter, two years for Mr. Mack and one year for each other officer. If we terminate the officer’s employment without cause, the officer is entitled to receive a severance payment based on his base salary. For Mr. Mack, this payment is 2 times his base salary, for Mr. Witham, this payment is 1.5 times his base salary, and for each other

officer, the payment is equal to his base salary. In addition, in a termination without cause, Mr. Koller is entitled to a payment equal to his earned commission, and each other officer is entitled to a payment equal to the performance bonus paid in the prior year, if any, except that Mr. Witham would be entitled to 1.5 times the performance bonus earned for the prior year. If there has been a change of control in our company and the officer’s employment is involuntarily terminated or the officer leaves for good reason within 12 months following the change of control, we would pay the officer the severance payments described above, except that Mr. Witham’s severance payment would be 2 times his base salary and 2 times the performance bonus earned for the prior year.

Warrant Repricing

     In February 2006, our Board of Directors determined that $9.00 more properly reflected the market value of our common stock and approved a repricing, from $13.50 per share to $9.00 per share, of the following warrants:

		Warrant
Name		Shares
Jeffrey C. Mack			21,666
Stephen E. Jacobs(1)			23,333
Christopher F. Ebbert			15,000
Marshall Group			4,444
Barry W. Butzow			16,667
Michael Frank			22,222

     The repricing was effected to provide ongoing incentives to our named executive officers, our other executive officers, our directors, our strategic partner, the Marshall Group, and Michael Frank, a former director. Going forward, our policy will be not to reprice derivative securities. The incremental compensation expense recognized during fiscal year 2006 in connection with this repricing in accordance with FAS 123R is included in the Summary Compensation Table above under the caption “Option Awards.”

2006 Equity Incentive Plan

     Our Board of Directors has adopted the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by our shareholders in February 2007. Participants in the plan may include our employees, officers, directors, consultants, or independent contractors who our compensation committee determines shall receive awards under the plan. The plan authorizes the grant of options to purchase common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the grant of options that do not qualify as incentive stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock bonuses, cash bonuses, stock appreciation rights, performance awards, dividend equivalents, warrants and other equity based awards. The number of shares of common stock originally reserved for issuance under the plan was 1,000,000 shares. As of May 1, 2007, we had 213,507 shares available for issuance under such plan. The plan expires on March 30, 2016.

     The plan is administered by a committee appointed by our Board of Directors. The compensation committee of our Board of Directors serves as the committee. The committee has the sole authority to determine which of the eligible individuals shall be granted awards, authorize the grant and terms of awards, to adopt, amend and rescind such rules and regulations as may be advisable in the administration of the plan, construe and interpret the plan and to make all determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the plan.

     Incentive options may be granted only to our officers and other employees or our corporate affiliates. Non-statutory options may be granted to employees, consultants, directors or independent contractors who the committee determines shall receive awards under the plan. We will not grant non-statutory options under the 2006 Equity Incentive

Plan with an exercise price of less than 100% of the fair market value of our company’s common stock on the date of grant.

     Generally, awards are non-transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, however, the committee may in its discretion permit the transfer of certain awards to immediate family members or trusts for the benefit of immediate family members. If the employment of a participant is terminated by our company for cause, then the committee shall have the right to cancel any awards granted to the participant whether or not vested under the plan.

     The following table shows the awards that have been granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan as of May 1, 2007. The outstanding awards to our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, the other named executive officer, our executive officers as a group, our non-executive directors as a group, and our non-executive officers as a group are set forth in the following table and the related footnotes.

Name and Position		Number of Shares
Jeffrey C. Mack Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director			291,666	(1)
John A. Witham Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President			141,666	(2)
Scott W. Koller Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing			95,000	(3)
Executive Group			699,332	(4)
Non-Executive Director Group			—
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group			87,161

     Details regarding the specific terms and conditions of each outstanding equity award at the end of 2006 are set forth below in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table and the related narrative.

Performance Bonus Plan for 2007

     Our compensation committee established that the following executive officers will have the following cash bonus potential upon achieving performance objectives for 2007:

Name and Position of Executive Officer		2007 Bonus Potential
Jeffrey C. Mack Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director		$175,000
John A. Witham Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		$70,000
Scott W. Koller Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing		$25,000
Christopher F. Ebbert Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer		$30,000
Brian S. Anderson Vice President and Controller		$25,000

     The committee set a certain performance objective for 2007. If 100% of such objective is met, 100% of each potential bonus will be paid. If at least 85% (but not 100%) of such objective is met, 50% of each potential bonus will be paid. If at least 75% (but not 85%) of such objective is met, 20% of each potential bonus will be paid. If less than 75% of such objective is met, no bonuses will be paid.

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year End

     The following table sets forth certain information concerning unexercised options for each named executive officer outstanding as of the end of 2006.

		Option Awards
										Equity Incentive
										Plan Awards:
		Number of				Number of				Number of
		Securities				Securities				Securities
		Underlying				Underlying				Underlying
		Unexercised Options				Unexercised Options				Unexercised				Option Exercise
		(#)				(#)				Unearned Options				Price				Option Expiration
Name		Exercisable (1)				Unexercisable (1)				(#)				($)				Date
Jeffrey C. Mack,			35,354(2)				—				—				2.25				07/12/2009
Chairman, President			18,333(2)				—								6.75				09/02/2010
Chief Executive Officer			21,666(2)				—								9.00				03/31/2011
and Director			41,666(3)				125,000(3)								4.00				03/30/2011
			—				125,000(4)								5.65				09/27/2011
John A. Witham,			22,222(2)				—				—				9.00				01/18/2011
Executive Vice			16,666(3)				50,000(3)								4.00				03/30/2011
President			—				75,000(4)								5.65				09/27/2011
and Chief Financial Officer
Scott W. Koller,			1,388(2)				—				—				6.75				12/15/2009
Executive Vice			5,555(2)				—								6.75				08/04/2010
President of Sales and			2,777(2)				—								11.25				10/10/2010
Marketing			1,851(2)				—								9.00				02/06/2011
			11,111(2)				—								9.00				03/24/2011
			—				95,000(4)								5.65				09/27/2011

     The Executive Employment Agreements described in the narrative to the Summary Compensation section above set forth all arrangements between our company and each of our named executive officers in connection with termination of employment, change of control of our company, and any changes to the named executive officer’s responsibilities following a change of control.

Non-Employee Director Compensation

     The following table sets forth, for each director who is not a named executive officer and for each former director who served on our Board during the year ended December 31, 2006, information concerning compensation earned for services in all capacities during the year ended December 31, 2006.

Compensation of Directors

																		Nonqualified
														Non-Equity				Deferred
		Fees Earned or Paid								Option Awards ($)				Incentive Plan				Compensation				All Other
Name		in Cash ($)				Stock Awards ($)				(1)				Compensation ($)				Earnings				Compensation ($)				Total ($)
Dr. William F. Schnell			—				—				37,617				—				—				—				37,617
Carl B. Walking Eagle Sr.			—				—				37,617				—				—				—				37,617
Gregory T. Barnum			—				—				37,617				—				—				—				37,617
Thomas J. Moudry			—				—				37,617				—				—				—				37,617
Brett A. Shockley			—				—				37,617				—				—				—				37,617
Michael Frank (2)			—				—				37,617				—				—				—				37,617
Barry W. Butzow (2)			—				—				37,617				—				—				—				37,617
Susan K. Haugerud (2)			—				—				37,617				—				—				—				37,617
Michael J. Hopkins (3)			—				—								—				—				—				—

2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan

     Our Board of Directors has adopted the 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan which provides for the grant of options to members of our Board of Directors who are not employees of our company or its subsidiaries. Our shareholders approved this plan in February 2007. Our non-employee directors have been granted awards under the 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. Under the plan, non-employee directors as of February 27, 2006 and each non-employee director thereafter elected to the Board is automatically entitled to a grant of a five-year option for the purchase of 40,000 shares of common stock, 10,000 of which vest and become exercisable on the date of grant, and additional increments of 10,000 shares become exercisable and vest upon each director’s reelection to the board. The plan is administered by the compensation committee of our board. The compensation committee is authorized to interpret the plan, amend and modify rules and regulations relating to the plan and amend the plan unless amendment is required to be approved by our shareholders pursuant to rules of any stock exchange or NASDAQ.

     The number of shares originally reserved for awards under the 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan was 510,000 shares. As of May 1, 2007, we had 280,000 shares available for issuance under such plan. Options are required to be granted at fair market value. As of May 1, 2007, outstanding options granted to our current and former directors under the 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan were as follows:

Michael Frank (1)		10,000 shares
Carl B. Walking Eagle Sr		40,000 shares
Barry W. Butzow (1)		10,000 shares
Gregory T. Barnum		40,000 shares
Thomas J. Moudry		40,000 shares
Brett A. Shockley		40,000 shares
William F. Schnell		40,000 shares
Susan K. Haugerud (1)		10,000 shares

     Each non-employee director option referenced above has an exercise price of $4.00 per share. Options for 10,000 shares vested immediately upon shareholder approval in February 2007 and expire in February 2008. Options for 40,000 shares vest at the rate of 10,000 shares effective February 27, 2006 for incumbent directors or upon election to the board for new directors, and 10,000 shares upon re-election to the board each year thereafter, and have a five-year term.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

     We believe that the terms of each of the following related party transactions were no less favorable to us than could have been obtained from an unaffiliated third party. With respect to the following transactions, each was ratified by a majority of our independent directors who did not have an interest in the transaction or who had access, at our expense, to our or independent legal counsel.

     We will enter into all future material affiliated transactions and loans with officers, directors and significant shareholders on terms that are no less favorable to us than those that can be obtained from unaffiliated, independent third parties. All future material affiliated transactions and loans, and any forgiveness of loans, must be approved by a majority of our independent directors who do not have an interest in the transactions and who had access, at our expense, to our independent legal counsel.

Convertible Notes

     Prior to our November 2006 initial public offering, we financed our company primarily through the sale of convertible notes, some of which were purchased by certain of our directors, executive officers or their affiliates. We entered into agreements with each of the holders of our outstanding convertible notes pursuant to which, among other things, the outstanding principal balances (plus, at the option of each holder, interest through the closing of our initial public offering) converted into shares of our common stock at $3.20 per share (80% of the initial public offering price) simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     Between May 20, 2003 and November 24, 2003, we borrowed an aggregate of $300,000 from Barry W. Butzow, a former director and a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, pursuant to four separate convertible notes. The notes had various maturities ranging from December 20, 2008 to June 26, 2009. Interest accrued at the rate of 10% per annum and was payable quarterly. Under the terms of the notes, Mr. Butzow had the option, prior to the maturity date, to convert the principal amount, in whole or in part, into shares of our capital stock at a price of $1.00 per share or the then-current offering price, whichever was less. We had the option to call the notes, in whole or in part, prior to the maturity date. In connection with the issuance of the notes, we issued to Mr. Butzow 16,666 shares of our common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 26,389 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. The outstanding principal amount of the notes and accrued interest of $103,908 were converted into 126,220 shares of common stock simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     Between June 16, 2003 and November 24, 2003, we sold three separate convertible notes in an aggregate amount of $250,000 to Jack Norqual, a former beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. The notes had five-year maturities ranging from September 10, 2009 to October 24, 2009. Interest accrued at the rate of 10% per annum and was payable quarterly. Under the terms of the notes, Mr. Norqual had the option, prior to the maturity date, to convert the principal amount, in whole or in part, into shares of our capital stock at a price of $1.00 per share or the then-current offering price, whichever was less. We had the option to call the notes, in whole or in part, prior to the maturity date. In connection with the issuance of the notes, we issued to Mr. Norqual 13,887 shares of our common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. The outstanding principal amount of the notes was converted into 78,125 shares of common stock, and we paid Mr. Norqual accrued interest on the notes of $85,103, simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     On July 11, 2003, we sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000 to Don Dorsey, a former beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. The note had a maturity date of June 14, 2009. Interest accrued at the rate of 10% per annum and was payable quarterly. Under the terms of the note, Mr. Dorsey had the option, prior to the maturity date, to convert the principal amount, in whole or in part, into shares of our capital stock at a price of $1.00 per share or the then-current offering price, whichever was less. We had the option to call this note, in whole or in part, prior to the maturity date. In connection with the issuance of this note, we issued to Mr. Dorsey 5,555 shares of our common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 8,333 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share.

The outstanding principal amount of the note was converted into 31,250 shares of common stock, and we paid Mr. Dorsey accrued interest on the note of $36,739, simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     On October 31, 2003, we sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000 to Stephen E. Jacobs, one of our former officers. The notes had a maturity date of May 28, 2009 and accrued interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was due quarterly. Under the terms of the note, Mr. Jacobs had the option, prior to the maturity date, to convert the principal amount, in whole or in part, into shares of our capital stock at a price of $1.00 per share or the then-current offering price, whichever was less. We had the option to call this note, in whole or in part, prior to the maturity date. In connection with the issuance of the note, we issued to Mr. Jacobs 5,555 shares of our common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 8,333 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. The outstanding principal amount of the note was converted into 31,250 shares of common stock, and we paid Mr. Jacobs accrued interest on the note of $33,000, simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     On October 31, 2003, we sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $25,000 to Steve Meyer, a former beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. The note had a maturity date of May 28, 2009. Interest accrued at the rate of 10% per annum and was payable quarterly. Under the terms of the note, Mr. Meyer had the option, prior to the maturity date, to convert the principal amount, in whole or in part, into shares of our capital stock at a price of $1.00 per share or the then-current offering price, whichever was less. We had the option to call this note, in whole or in part, prior to the maturity date. In connection with the issuance of this note, we issued to Mr. Meyer 1,388 shares of our common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 2,083 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. The outstanding principal amount of the note was converted into 7,812 shares of common stock, and we paid Mr. Meyer accrued interest on the note of $5,125, simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     On November 24, 2003, we sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000 to Mr. Dorsey. The note had a maturity date of June 26, 2009. Interest accrued at the rate of 10% per annum and was payable quarterly. Under the terms of the note, Mr. Dorsey had the option, prior to the maturity date, to convert the principal amount, in whole or in part, into shares of our capital stock at a price of $1.00 per share or the offering price, whichever was less. We had the option to call this note, in whole or in part, prior to the maturity date. In connection with the issuance of this note, we issued to Mr. Dorsey 5,555 shares of our common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 8,333 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. The outstanding principal amount of the note was converted into 31,250 shares of common stock, and we paid Mr. Dorsey accrued interest on the note of $31,105, simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     On March 12, 2004, we sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000 to Mr. Meyer. The note had a maturity date of September 30, 2006. Interest accrued at the rate of 10% per annum and was payable at maturity. Under the terms of the note, Mr. Meyer had the option, prior to the maturity date, to convert the principal amount, in whole or in part, into shares of our capital stock at a price of $1.00 per share or the then-current offering price, whichever was less. We had the option to call this note, in whole or in part, prior to the maturity date. In connection with the issuance of this note, we issued to Mr. Meyer 5,555 shares of our common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 8,333 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. The outstanding principal amount of the note was converted into 31,250 shares of common stock, and we paid Mr. Meyer accrued interest on the note of $15,094, simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     On July 22, 2004, we sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $200,000 to R.A. Stinski, a former beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. The note had a maturity date of July 22, 2006. In connection with the issuance of this note, we issued to Mr. Stinski 11,111 shares of our common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 16,667 shares of our common stock at $13.50 per share. On August 25, 2006, Mr. Stinski exchanged this promissory note for $237,933 in principal amount of our 12% convertible bridge notes together with warrants to purchase 47,586 shares of our common stock. In connection with this exchange, we also issued to Mr. Stinski 20,000 shares of our common stock. Subsequent to our initial public offering in November 2006, the promissory note and the accrued interest were converted into an aggregate of 77,501 shares of common stock.

     On December 22, 2004, we sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $33,550 to Christopher F. Ebbert, an executive officer of our company. The note had a maturity date of July 22, 2010 and was convertible into shares of our capital stock at a price of $1.00 per share or the then-current offering price, whichever was less. Interest accrued at the rate of 10% per annum and is due quarterly. In connection with the issuance of the note, we issued to Mr. Ebbert a five-year warrant to purchase 3,727 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. The outstanding principal amount of the note was converted into 10,484 shares of common stock, and we paid Mr. Ebbert accrued interest on the note of $7,291, simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     At the closing of our initial public offering, pursuant to the terms of convertible debenture agreements which we entered into with the Spirit Lake Tribe, a federally recognized Native American tribe and a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, our indebtedness to the Spirit Lake Tribe incurred in 2005 aggregating $3,000,000 automatically converted into 1,302,004 shares of common stock, representing 30% of our issued and outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis, determined without giving effect to shares issued in connection with our public offering, or shares issued or issuable upon conversion of our outstanding 12% convertible bridge notes or the exercise of warrants issued to purchasers of the bridge notes between March 2006 and August 2006. Certain of those shares are offered by Spirit Lake Tribe pursuant to our proposed public offering. Mr. Carl B. Walking Eagle, Sr., a director, is an officer and member of the Spirit Lake Tribal Council.

Non-Convertible Notes

     On January 30, 2004, we entered into a note in the principal amount of $26,700 with Mr. Butzow. As of May 12, 2006, the balance of this non-convertible note was $13,750 and it matures on December 31, 2009. Interest accrues at the rate of 10% per annum and is due quarterly. In connection with this note, we issued to Mr. Butzow a five-year warrant to purchase 2,967 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. This note was repaid in November 2006.

Other Financing Agreements

     On November 2, 2004, we entered into a business loan agreement with Signature Bank that provided us with a variable rate revolving line of credit of $300,000 personally guaranteed by Barry W. Butzow. As of December 31, 2006, we had no amounts outstanding under this line. Interest accrued at a variable interest rate of 1.5 percentage points over the U.S. Bank index rate and was payable the first day of each month. We were able to prepay all or a portion of the loan early without penalty. In consideration for Mr. Butzow’s personal guarantee, we issued to Mr. Butzow a five-year warrant to purchase 16,667 shares of our common stock at $13.50 per share. These warrants were subsequently repriced to $9.00 per share as described under “Warrant Repricing” below.

     On December 8, 2004, we entered into a 36-month lease agreement with Winmark Capital Corporation for office equipment and furniture. As of December 31, 2006, we had a remaining lease obligation of $65,695. Our payment obligations under the lease are approximately $4,292 per month. This lease has been personally guaranteed by Stephen Jacobs, one of our former officers. In consideration for his personal guarantee, we issued to Mr. Jacobs a five-year warrant to purchase 8,333 shares of our common stock at $13.50 per share. These warrants were subsequently repriced to $9.00 per share as described under “Warrant Repricing” below.

     On November 10, 2005, we entered into a business loan agreement with Signature Bank that provided us with a variable rate revolving line of credit of $200,000 personally guaranteed by Mr. Butzow. As of December 31, 2006, we had no amounts outstanding under this line. Interest accrued at a variable interest rate of 1.5 percentage points over the U.S. Bank index rate and was payable the first day of each month. We were able to prepay all or a portion of the loan early without penalty. In consideration for his personal guarantee, we issued to Mr. Butzow a five-year warrant to purchase 5,556 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share.

     On May 23, 2005, we entered into a factoring agreement with Stephen E. Jacobs and Barry W. Butzow, whereby we agreed to assign and sell to Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Butzow certain of our receivables. They had the ability to limit their

purchases to receivables arising from sales to any one customer or a portion of the net amount of the receivable. We granted a continuing security interest in all receivables purchased under the agreement. We paid interest equal to two times the prime rate of interest published by Signature Bank in effect at the time of purchase. The interest rate applied to all receivables purchased under the agreement. The interest amount was based on the receivable balance until collected and was subject to change based on changes in the prime rate. In consideration for this agreement, we agreed to issue to Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Butzow five-year warrants to purchase shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share in an amount equal to 100% of the net dollar amount of receivables sold to Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Butzow. As of December 31, 2006, we had issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 39,492 shares at $9.00 per share relating to this agreement. As of December 31, 2006, we had no amounts outstanding under this agreement. On March 22, 2007, we terminated the factoring agreement with Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Butzow. We refer you to Note H of our financials for a discussion of our accounting treatment.

     On November 11, 2005, we sold a 90-day promissory note to SHAG LLC in the principal amount of $100,000. Dr. William Schnell, one of our non-employee directors, is a member of SHAG LLC. The interest rate of the note was 10% per year. As additional consideration, we issued to SHAG LLC a five-year warrant to purchase 2,778 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. We agreed with SHAG LLC to increase the amount of the note to $107,500 and extend the term in exchange for the right to convert amounts outstanding under the note into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate equal to 80% of the initial public offering price. The outstanding principal amount of the note and accrued interest of $8,630 was converted into 36,289 shares of common stock simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

     On December 27, 2005, we sold a 90-day promissory note to Mr. Butzow in the principal amount of $300,000. The interest rate of the note is 10% per year. As additional consideration, we issued to Mr. Butzow a five-year warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at $6.30 per share. On March 27, 2006, we extended the maturity date of this note for 90 days. As additional consideration, we issued to Mr. Butzow a six-year warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at $6.30 per share. On June 27, 2006, Mr. Butzow agreed to extend the maturity date of his promissory note to July 31, 2006 and to exchange the promissory note for our 12% convertible bridge notes in the principal amount of the promissory note, plus accrued interest, together with warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. In consideration for the extension, we agreed to issue to Mr. Butzow 22,666 shares of our common stock. On July 27, 2006, we issued to Mr. Butzow 12% convertible bridge notes in the principal amount of $315,625 and warrants to purchase 63,125 shares of our common stock in exchange for this promissory note. Subsequent to our initial public offering in November 2006, the promissory note and the accrued interest were converted into an aggregate of 103,761 shares of common stock.

     On January 12, 2006, we entered into a business loan agreement with Signature Bank that provides us with a variable rate revolving line of credit of $250,000 personally guaranteed by Michael J. Hopkins, one of our employees and a former director. As of December 31, 2006, we had no amounts outstanding under this line. Interest accrues at a variable interest rate of 1.5 percentage points over the U.S. Bank index rate and is payable the first day of each month. We may prepay all or a portion of the loan early without penalty. In consideration for his personal guarantee, we issued to Mr. Hopkins a five-year warrant to purchase 6,944 shares of our common stock at $9.00 per share. This note was repaid in November 2006.

     On February 14, 2006, we entered into a 36-month lease agreement with Winmark Capital Corporation for office equipment and furniture. As of December 31, 2006, we had a remaining lease obligation of $43,420. Our payment obligations under the lease are approximately $1,855 per month.

     On December 30, 2006, we entered into a 36 month lease agreement with Winmark Capital Corporation for office equipment and furniture. As of December 31, 2006, we had a remaining lease obligation of $152,651. Our payment obligations under the lease are approximately $5,296 per month.

Warrant Repricing

     In February 2006, our Board of Directors determined that $9.00 more properly reflected the market value of our common stock and approved a repricing, from $13.50 per share to $9.00 per share, of the following warrants:

		Warrant
Name		Shares
Jeffrey C. Mack			21,666
Stephen E. Jacobs(1)			23,333
Christopher F. Ebbert			15,000
Marshall Group			4,444
Barry W. Butzow			16,667
Michael Frank			22,222

     The repricing was effected to provide ongoing incentives to our named executive officers, our other executive officers, our directors, our strategic partner, the Marshall Group, and Michael Frank, a former director. Going forward, our policy will be not to reprice equity instruments.

Executive Employment Agreements

     The terms of the Executive Employment Agreement between our company and our current officers is set forth in the narrative following the Summary Compensation Table above.

Agreement with Spanlink Communications, Inc.

     On June 11, 2007, we executed a statement of work with Spanlink Communications, Inc. relating to the acquisition of a communications system for a new office location. The statement of work specifies a Cisco Unified Communications system, including hardware, software and services in connection with the installation and maintenance of the system, and arises out of a proposal from Spanlink and a master services agreement signed by the parties in April 2007. Brett A. Shockley, one of our directors, is the President, Chairman, a Director and principal shareholder of Spanlink Communications, Inc. We estimate that the amount of the contract will be $206,000. We believe the communication system to be acquired from Spanlink and the cost thereof to be competitive with systems that could be provided by unrelated parties.

Director Independence

     The Board is comprised of a majority of “independent” directors as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The independent directors are identified by name in the chart that appears in “Management and board of directors.”

     As noted above, our Board of Directors has an Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Each committee consists solely of members who are independent as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. In addition, each member of the Audit Committee is independent as defined in Exchange Act Rule 10A-3 and each member of the Compensation Committee is a non-employee director and is an outside director under the rules of the SEC and the IRS, respectively.

     Mr. Frank, Mr. Butzow, Mr. Hopkins and Ms. Haugerud resigned from the Board during 2006. Mr. Frank and Ms. Haugerud were independent directors.

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

     The following table sets forth certain information known to us regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of May 1, 2007, by (a) each person who is known to us to own beneficially more than five percent of our common stock, (b) each director, (c) each executive officer, and (d) all current executive officers and directors as a group. The percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 9,862,564 shares outstanding as of May 1, 2007. The following table does not include any adjustment that may result from our proposed public offering described elsewhere in this prospectus. As indicated in the footnotes, shares issuable pursuant to warrants and options are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such warrants or options but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Unless otherwise noted, each person identified below has sole voting and investment power with respect to such shares. Except as otherwise noted below and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the named individual has sole voting and investment power with respect to the listed shares. None of the listed shares has been pledged as security, except that Mr. Mack has pledged 2,000 shares as security for a loan. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each listed shareholder is c/o Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc., 14700 Martin Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344.

		Shares Beneficially Owned (1)
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)		Number				Percentage
Carl B. Walking Eagle Sr.			1,356,446	(2)			13.8	%
Spirit Lake Tribe			1,346,446	(3)			13.7	%
Perkins Capital Management, Inc.			1,156,613	(4)			11.8	%
Gruber and McBaine Capital Management, LLC			723,350	(5)			7.4	%
Heartland Advisors, Inc.			723,000	(6)			7.4	%
Barry W. Butzow			594,499	(7)			5.9	%
Jeffrey C. Mack			160,686	(8)			1.6	%
Christopher F. Ebbert			140,316	(9)			1.4	%
Dr. William F. Schnell			111,147	(10)			1.1	%
John A. Witham			55,555	(11)			*
Scott W. Koller			24,307	(12)			*
Thomas J. Moudry			15,000	(13)			*
Gregory T. Barnum			10,000	(14)			*
Brett A. Shockley			10,000	(14)			*
Brian S. Anderson			8,472	(15)			*
All current executive officers and directors as a group (10 persons)			1,891,929	(16)			19.2	%

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

     Our authorized capital stock consists of 66,666,666 shares, par value $0.01 per share, consisting of 50,000,000 shares of common stock and 16,666,666 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of May 1, 2007, we had 9,862,564 shares of common stock outstanding held by 215 holders, and no outstanding shares of preferred stock.

     The holders of our common stock:

	•		have the right to receive ratably any dividends from funds legally available therefor, when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors;
	•		are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets available for distribution to holders of our common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of our company; and
	•		are entitled to one vote per share on all matters which shareholders may vote on at all meetings of shareholders.

     All shares of our common stock now outstanding are fully paid and nonassessable. There are no redemption, sinking fund, conversion or preemptive rights with respect to the shares of our common stock.

     The holders of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights. Subject to the rights of any future series of preferred stock, the holders of a plurality of outstanding shares voting for the election of our directors can elect all of the directors to be elected, if they so choose. In such event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any of our directors.

Undesignated Preferred Stock

     Under governing Minnesota law and our amended and restated articles of incorporation, no action by our shareholders is necessary, and only action of our Board of Directors is required, to authorize the issuance of up to 16,666,666 shares of undesignated preferred stock. Our Board of Directors is empowered to establish, and to designate the name of, each class or series of the undesignated preferred shares and to set the terms of such shares, including terms with respect to redemption, sinking fund, dividend, liquidation, preemptive, conversion and voting rights and preferences. Accordingly, our Board of Directors, without shareholder approval, may issue preferred stock having rights, preferences, privileges or restrictions, including voting rights, that may be greater than the rights of holders of common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock upon the rights of holders of our common stock until our Board of Directors determines the specific rights of the holders of such preferred stock. However, the effects might include, among other things, restricting dividends on our common stock, diluting the voting power of our common stock, impairing the liquidation rights of our common stock and delaying or preventing a change in control of our company without further action by our shareholders. Our Board of Directors has no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

     We will not issue preferred stock to our officers, directors, significant shareholders or others deemed to be “promoters” under the North American Securities Administrators Association Statement of Policy Regarding Corporate Securities Definitions unless we offer it to all other existing shareholders or to new shareholders on the same terms, or the issuance is approved by a majority of our independent directors who do not have an interest in the issuance and who have access, at our expense, to our counsel or independent counsel.

Warrants and Registration Rights

     In connection with convertible notes and other debt agreements issued to private investors and to other individuals for services rendered, we have issued certain warrants. As of May 1, 2007, we had outstanding five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,519,583 shares of our common stock and outstanding six-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 50,000 shares of our common stock. The warrants are currently exercisable at prices ranging from $.09 to $45.00 per share, subject to adjustment pursuant to antidilution provisions contained in the warrant agreements.

     Of the 2,569,583 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants outstanding as of May 1, 2007, 450,000 shares are issuable upon exercise of a warrant we issued to the underwriter of our initial public offering. This warrant is eligible to participate on a “piggy-back” basis in any registration by us for the duration of the warrant and two years thereafter, and for a one time “demand” registration if and when we are eligible to use Form S-3. We have been advised that the holder of such warrant has elected not to participate in this resale registration statement or our proposed public offering as a selling shareholder.

Restrictions on Issuance of Options and Warrants

     As required by certain state securities regulators, we have agreed that during the one-year period commencing on the effective date of our initial public offering, we will not have outstanding options or warrants to purchase more than an aggregate of 1,096,610 shares of common stock with an exercise price of less than $4.00 per share. This limit represents 15% of the shares of our common stock outstanding upon completion of our initial public offering.

Anti-Takeover Provisions

     Certain provisions of Minnesota law and our articles of incorporation and bylaws described below could have an anti-takeover effect. These provisions are intended to provide management with flexibility in responding to an unsolicited takeover offer and to discourage certain types of unsolicited takeover offers for our company. However, these provisions could have the effect of discouraging attempts to acquire us, which could deprive our shareholders of opportunities to sell their shares at prices higher than prevailing market prices.

     Section 302A.671 of the Minnesota Business Corporation Act applies, with certain exceptions, to any acquisition of our voting stock from a person, other than us and other than in connection with certain mergers and exchanges to which we are a party, that results in the acquiring person owning 20% or more of our voting stock then outstanding. Similar triggering events occur at the one-third and majority ownership levels. Section 302A.671 requires approval of any such acquisition by a majority vote of our disinterested shareholders and a majority vote of all of our shareholders. In general, shares acquired in excess of the applicable percentage threshold in the absence of such approval are denied voting rights and are redeemable at their then fair market value by us during a specified time period.

     Section 302A.673 of the Minnesota Business Corporation Act generally prohibits us or any of our subsidiaries from entering into any business combination transaction with a shareholder for a period of four years after the shareholder acquires 10% or more of our voting stock then outstanding. An exception is provided for circumstances in which, before the 10% share-ownership threshold is reached, either the transaction or the share acquisition is approved by a committee of our Board of Directors composed of one or more disinterested directors.

     The Minnesota Business Corporation Act contains a “fair price” provision in Section 302A.675. This provision provides that no person may acquire any of our shares within two years following the person’s last purchase of our shares in a takeover offer unless all shareholders are given the opportunity to dispose of their shares to the person on terms that are substantially equivalent to those in the earlier takeover offer. This provision does not apply if the acquisition is approved by a committee of disinterested directors before any shares are acquired in the takeover offer.

     Section 302A.553, subdivision 3, of the Minnesota Business Corporation Act prohibits us from purchasing any voting shares owned for less than two years from a holder of more than 5% of our outstanding voting stock for more than the market value of the shares. Exceptions to this provision are provided if the share purchase is approved by a majority of our shareholders or if we make a repurchase offer of equal or greater value to all shareholders.

     Our articles of incorporation provide that the holders of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights. For the shareholders to call a special meeting, our bylaws require that at least 10% of the voting power must join in the request. Our articles of incorporation give our Board of Directors the power to issue any or all of the shares of undesignated preferred stock, including the authority to establish one or more series and to fix the powers, preferences,

rights and limitations of such class or series, without seeking shareholder approval. Our Board of Directors also has the right to fill vacancies of the board, including a vacancy created by an increase in the size of the Board of Directors.

     Our bylaws provide for an advance notice procedure for the nomination, other than by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, of candidates for election as directors, as well as for other shareholder proposals to be considered at annual meetings of shareholders. In general, notice of intent to nominate a director or raise matters at such meetings will have to be received by us not less than 90 days prior to the date fixed for the annual meeting, and must contain certain information concerning the persons to be nominated or the matters to be brought before the meeting and concerning the shareholders submitting the proposal.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

     The transfer agent and registrar with respect to our common stock is Registrar and Transfer Company.

Listing

     Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “RNIN.” We intend to apply for listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “RNIN” assuming we meet the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Market following our proposed public offering.

SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

     The following table presents information regarding the selling shareholders. Unless otherwise noted, the shares listed below represent the shares that each selling shareholder beneficially owned on December 31, 2006. The shares being offered hereunder represent an aggregate of 3,775,705 shares issued upon conversion of 12% convertible bridge notes, convertible notes and convertible debentures, and 2,160,061 shares issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants.

     We are registering the above-referenced shares to permit each of the selling shareholders and their pledges, donees, transferees or other successors-in-interest that receive their shares from the selling shareholders as a gift, partnership distribution or other non-sale related transfer after the date of this prospectus to resell the shares.

     The following table sets forth the name of each selling shareholder, the number of shares owned by each of the selling shareholders as of December 31, 2006, the number of shares that may be offered under this prospectus and the number of shares of our common stock owned by the selling shareholders after this offering is completed, assuming all of the shares being offered are sold. Except as otherwise disclosed below, none of the selling shareholders has, or within the past three years has had, any position, office or other material relationship with us. The number of shares in the column “Shares Offered” represents all of the shares that a selling shareholder may offer under this prospectus.

     Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d) promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act. The percentages of shares beneficially owned are based on 9,825,621 shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2006, plus the shares of common stock beneficially owned by the respective selling shareholder, as set forth in the following table and more fully described in the applicable footnotes.

														Shares
		Shares				Percent								Beneficially				Percent
		Beneficially				Beneficially								Owned if All				Beneficially
		Owned				Owned								Shares are				Owned
		Before				Before				Shares				Sold in the				After
Name and Address of Selling Shareholder (1)		Offering (2)				Offering(2)				Offered				Offering				Offering
Spirit Lake Tribe P.O. Box 359 Fort Totten, ND 58335			1,346,446				13.7	%			1,302,004				44,442				*
Barry W. Butzow 9714 Brassie Circle Eden Prairie, MN 55347			594,497	(3)			5.9	%			528,501	(4)			65,996	(5)			*
Jack Norqual 9493 Olympia Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55347			384,252	(6)			3.9	%			331,033	(7)			53,219				*
R. A. Stinski 3647 McKinley St. N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55418			209,360	(8)			2.1	%			170,195	(9)			39,165				*
C. Donald Dorsey 3717 S. Gambel Quail Way Superstition Mountain, AZ 85218			195,551	(10)			2.0	%			184,441	(11)			11,110				*
Stephen Jacobs 9420 Olympia Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55437			178,765	(12)			1.8	%			158,210	(13)			20,555	(14)			*
Ben Reuben and Sophie Reuben, JTWROS 899 Lincoln Ave. St. Paul, MN 55105			159,467	(15)			1.6	%			159,467	(15)			0				0	%
Galtere International Master Fund, L.P. 7 East 20th Street, 11R New York, NY 10003			142,492	(16)			1.5	%			123,048	(17)			19,444				*
Christopher F. Ebbert 4821 13th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55417			140,316	(18)			1.4	%			102,539	(19)			37,777				*
Jeffrey C. Mack 6489 Promontory Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346			119,019	(20)			1.2	%			75,353	(21)			43,666	(22)			*
William F. Schnell 2708 Branch Street Duluth, MN 55812			111,147	(23)			1.1	%			2,083	(21)			109,064	(24)			1.1	%
Hal B. Heyer 214 North 34th Avenue East Duluth, MN 55804			91,147	(25)			*				2,083	(21)			89,064	(26)			*
Peter Goldschmidt 3221 Ewing Avenue Duluth, MN 55803			91,147	(27)			*				2,083	(21)			89,064	(26)			*
Robin Hendricks 5290 Lakewood Road Duluth, MN 55804			91,147	(28)			*				2,083	(21)			89,064	(26)			*
Steven P. Meyer 9088 Neil Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347			82,712	(29)			*				70,214	(30)			12,498				*
Industricorp & Co., Inc. FBO Twin City Carpenters Pension Plan			81,484	(31)			*				81,484	(31)			0				0	%
SHAG, LLC 214 34th Avenue East Duluth, MN 55804			80,731	(32)			*				47,398	(33)			33,333				*

														Shares
		Shares				Percent								Beneficially				Percent
		Beneficially				Beneficially								Owned if All				Beneficially
		Owned				Owned								Shares are				Owned
		Before				Before				Shares				Sold in the				After
Name and Address of Selling Shareholder (1)		Offering (2)				Offering(2)				Offered				Offering				Offering
Jill Jensen-Behr 845 Bradford Avenue North Champlin, MN 55316			79,215	(34)			*				29,360	(21)			49,855				*
A. Russell Melgaard 7900 E. Oakmont Place Sioux Falls, SD 57110			70,000	(35)			*				70,000	(35)			0				0	%
J. Steven Emerson 1522 Ensley Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90024			68,645				*				68,645				0				0	%
W. Bruce Erickson TTEE, W. Bruce Erickson Revocable Trust U/A 10/14/2003 4041 16th Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55407			64,874	(36)			*				64,874	(36)			0				0	%
Thomas L. Thompson and Katherine A. Thompson			63,682	(37)			*				52,572	(38)			11,110				*
323 Woodland Hills W. Brainerd, MN 56401
Destin Capital Partners c/o Martin B. Rowe 946 4th St. Eldorado, IL 62930			54,322	(39)			*				54,322	(39)			0				0	%
Courtney Pulkrabek 210 No. Broadway P. O. Box 622 Crookston, MN 56716			54,322	(39)			*				54,322	(39)			0				0	%
Industricorp & Co., Inc. FBO 1561000091 312 Central Ave. SE, Suite 508 Minneapolis, MN 55414			52,572	(38)			*				52,572	(38)			0				0	%
Ilo E. Leppik 7500 Western Ave. Golden Valley, MN 55427			51,250	(40)			*				51,250	(40)			0				0	%
Richard H. Enrico 7585 Equitable Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344			47,914	(41)			*				42,359	(42)			5,555				*
Paul L. Heibel 20558 Vails Lake Rd. Eden Valley, MN 55329			46,125	(43)			*				25,625	(44)			20,500				*
2nd Wind Exercise Equipment 7585 Equitable Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344			45,137	(45)			*				39,582	(46)			5,555				*
UBS Financial Services, Custodian f/b/o Randall W. Barnes c/o UBS Financial Services 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800 Minneapolis, MN 55402			45,137	(45)			*				39,582	(46)			5,555				*
Michael Hopkins 19549 Jersey Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044			45,052	(47)			*				26,720	(21)			18,332				*
Michael J. Frank 4964 Safari Circle Eagan, MN 55122			44,719	(48)			*				31,942	(21)			12,777	(49)			*

														Shares
		Shares				Percent								Beneficially				Percent
		Beneficially				Beneficially								Owned if All				Beneficially
		Owned				Owned								Shares are				Owned
		Before				Before				Shares				Sold in the				After
Name and Address of Selling Shareholder (1)		Offering (2)				Offering(2)				Offered				Offering				Offering
Lorax Investments, LLC 4555 Erin Drive, Suite #190 Eagan, MN 55122			42,808	(50)			*				39,559	(51)			3,249				*
B Square 110 110th Avenue NE, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98004			41,856	(52)			*				2,666	(21)			39,190				*
Robert G. Allison			40,742	(53)			*				40,742	(53)			0				0	%
PR Partners c/o Jeff Sowada 34 Peninsula Road Dellwood, MN 55111			40,000	(21)			*				40,000	(21)			0				0	%
John A. Witham 10456 Purdey Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347			38,888	(54)			*				22,222	(21)			16,666	(55)			*
Beverly J. Stathopoulus Trust 13212 Northern Dr. Burnsville, MN 55337			33,625	(56)			*				25,625	(44)			8,000				*
Marshall Special Assets Group LLC 225 South 6th Street, Suite 2900 Minneapolis, MN 55402			29,442	(57)			*				18,331	(21)			11,111				*
James and Barbara Koberstein 2132 Ponderosa Circle Duluth, MN 55811			27,776	(58)			*				5,554	(21)			22,222				*
Kenneth Grant 1201 N. 21st St. Superior, WI 54880			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%
Jerald D. Sprau 7722 Somerset Rd. Woodbury, MN 55125			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%
Bruce Rubinger 11965 Orchard Ave. West Minnetonka, MN 55305			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%
Jack Klingert 4600 Dallas Ln. N. Plymouth, MN 55446			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%
Richard W. Perkins Trustee U/A dtd 6/14/78 FBO Richard W. Perkins			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%
Daniel S. and Patrice M. Perkins JTWROS 55 Landmark Long Lake, MN 55356			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%
Piper Jaffray & Co as Cust FBO David H. Potter IRA			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%
Alice Ann Corporation			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%
Daniel B. Ahlberg TTEE and Linda O. Ahlberg TTEE Ahlberg Joint Revocable Trust U/A dated 8/24/06			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%
Dennis D. Gonyea			27,161	(59)			*				27,161	(59)			0				0	%